|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Geological Survey of Canada, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa K1A 0E4 Canada
The mechanical paradox of large overthrusts originates with a fallacious assumption in the conceptual model upon which mechanical analyses of overthrust faulting have been based. The notion that the maximum width of a sheet of rock that may be displaced along an overthrust fault can be determined by using the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion to compare the strength of the rocks with the stress required to overcome the total frictional resistance to slip (and the total cohesion or adhesion?) over the entire fault surface tacitly assumes that slip is initiated, and occurs, simultaneously over the entire fault surface. This unstated and untenable assumption, which is incompatible with what is known about real faults, is the real explanation for the "mechanical paradox."
A realistic model for overthrust faulting must be compatible with the nature of real overthrust faults, and particularly with the way in which displacements, including earthquake displacements, occur on real faults. Most large overthrusts are discrete shear surfaces within a coherent mass of rock that is physically continuous around their ends. Total displacement clearly varies from place to place over these discrete shear surfaces and, moreover, must be the cumulative result of many relatively small incremental displacements that also varied from place to place over the finite part of the fault surface on which they occurred. Each increment began as a local shear failure and propagated along the fault as a "smeared-out" (Somigliana) dislocation at a velocity that was small considering the time required for propagation over the total area of the fault. During any individual displacement "event," whether a megathrust earthquake or a creep event, only a small part of the fault surface was in relative motion at any one time. Fault displacements may appear to occur simultaneously across laboratory specimens that are very small relative to the velocity of propagation of displacement because the transit time is so short. When the linear scale is expanded over six orders of magnitude to encompass an entire surface of a large overthrust fault, however, the transit time is much longer because the velocity of propagation is very small relative to the area of the fault surface, and the displacement clearly involves only a very small part of the fault surface at any one time.
The shape and size of overthrust faults result from the propagation of dislocations, and this process is controlled by the strength heterogeneity and anisotropy of the rock mass as well as by variations in the regional stress field, but not by the frictional resistance to sliding integrated over the entire fault surface.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. A. Thomas, R. V.S. Kanda, K. D. O'Hara, and D. M. Surles Thermal footprint of an eroded thrust sheet in the southern Appalachian thrust belt, Alabama, USA Geosphere, October 1, 2008; 4(5): 814 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Stockmal, C. Beaumont, M. Nguyen, and B. Lee Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical models Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): 63 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Hatcher Jr., P. J. Lemiszki, and J. B. Whisner Character of rigid boundaries and internal deformation of the southern Appalachian foreland fold-thrust belt Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): 243 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Khudoley and A. V. Prokopiev Defining the eastern boundary of the North Asian craton from structural and subsidence history studies of the Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): 391 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.W. Sears, T. A. Harms, and C. A. Evenchick Whence the mountains? The contributions of Raymond A. Price Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): xi - xviii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Niviere, M. Giamboni, C. Innocent, and T. Winter Kinematic evolution of a tectonic wedge above a flat-lying decollement: The Alpine foreland at the interface between the Jura Mountains (Northern Alps) and the Upper Rhine graben Geology, June 1, 2006; 34(6): 469 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Heermance, Z. K. Shipton, and J. P. Evans Fault Structure Control on Fault Slip and Ground Motion during the 1999 Rupture of the Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1034 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Sibson Thickness of the Seismic Slip Zone Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1169 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Geomorphology of kilometer-scale extensional fault scarps: factors that impact seismic interpretation AAPG Bulletin, February 1, 2003; 87(2): 251 - 272. |
||||
![]() |
N. P. Badertscher, R. Abart, M. Burkhard, and A. McCaig Fluid flow pathways along the Glarus overthrust derived from stable and Sr-isotope patterns Am J Sci, June 1, 2002; 302(6): 517 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Shattered Rock and Precarious Rock Evidence for Strong Asymmetry in Ground Motions during Thrust Faulting Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2001; 91(3): 441 - 447. |
||||
![]() |
B. Shi, A. Anooshehpoor, J. N. Brune, and Y. Zeng Dynamics of thrust faulting: 2D lattice model Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1484 - 1494. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Couples, H. Lewis, and P. W. Geoff Tanner Strain partitioning during flexural-slip folding Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 127(1): 149 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Walsh and J. Watterson Geometric and kinematic coherence and scale effects in normal fault systems Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1991; 56(1): 193 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |