Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; December 1988; v. 100; no. 12; p. 1898-1908; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<1898:TMPOLO>2.3.CO;2
© 1988 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRICE, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The mechanical paradox of large overthrusts

RAYMOND A. PRICE1

1 Geological Survey of Canada, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa K1A 0E4 Canada

The mechanical paradox of large overthrusts originates with a fallacious assumption in the conceptual model upon which mechanical analyses of overthrust faulting have been based. The notion that the maximum width of a sheet of rock that may be displaced along an overthrust fault can be determined by using the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion to compare the strength of the rocks with the stress required to overcome the total frictional resistance to slip (and the total cohesion or adhesion?) over the entire fault surface tacitly assumes that slip is initiated, and occurs, simultaneously over the entire fault surface. This unstated and untenable assumption, which is incompatible with what is known about real faults, is the real explanation for the "mechanical paradox."

A realistic model for overthrust faulting must be compatible with the nature of real overthrust faults, and particularly with the way in which displacements, including earthquake displacements, occur on real faults. Most large overthrusts are discrete shear surfaces within a coherent mass of rock that is physically continuous around their ends. Total displacement clearly varies from place to place over these discrete shear surfaces and, moreover, must be the cumulative result of many relatively small incremental displacements that also varied from place to place over the finite part of the fault surface on which they occurred. Each increment began as a local shear failure and propagated along the fault as a "smeared-out" (Somigliana) dislocation at a velocity that was small considering the time required for propagation over the total area of the fault. During any individual displacement "event," whether a megathrust earthquake or a creep event, only a small part of the fault surface was in relative motion at any one time. Fault displacements may appear to occur simultaneously across laboratory specimens that are very small relative to the velocity of propagation of displacement because the transit time is so short. When the linear scale is expanded over six orders of magnitude to encompass an entire surface of a large overthrust fault, however, the transit time is much longer because the velocity of propagation is very small relative to the area of the fault surface, and the displacement clearly involves only a very small part of the fault surface at any one time.

The shape and size of overthrust faults result from the propagation of dislocations, and this process is controlled by the strength heterogeneity and anisotropy of the rock mass as well as by variations in the regional stress field, but not by the frictional resistance to sliding integrated over the entire fault surface.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeosphereHome page
W. A. Thomas, R. V.S. Kanda, K. D. O'Hara, and D. M. Surles
Thermal footprint of an eroded thrust sheet in the southern Appalachian thrust belt, Alabama, USA
Geosphere, October 1, 2008; 4(5): 814 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
G. S. Stockmal, C. Beaumont, M. Nguyen, and B. Lee
Mechanics of thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts: Insights from numerical models
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): 63 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
R. D. Hatcher Jr., P. J. Lemiszki, and J. B. Whisner
Character of rigid boundaries and internal deformation of the southern Appalachian foreland fold-thrust belt
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): 243 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
A. K. Khudoley and A. V. Prokopiev
Defining the eastern boundary of the North Asian craton from structural and subsidence history studies of the Verkhoyansk fold-and-thrust belt
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): 391 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
J.W. Sears, T. A. Harms, and C. A. Evenchick
Whence the mountains? The contributions of Raymond A. Price
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): xi - xviii.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
B. Niviere, M. Giamboni, C. Innocent, and T. Winter
Kinematic evolution of a tectonic wedge above a flat-lying decollement: The Alpine foreland at the interface between the Jura Mountains (Northern Alps) and the Upper Rhine graben
Geology, June 1, 2006; 34(6): 469 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. Heermance, Z. K. Shipton, and J. P. Evans
Fault Structure Control on Fault Slip and Ground Motion during the 1999 Rupture of the Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1034 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. H. Sibson
Thickness of the Seismic Slip Zone
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2003; 93(3): 1169 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Geomorphology of kilometer-scale extensional fault scarps: factors that impact seismic interpretation
AAPG Bulletin, February 1, 2003; 87(2): 251 - 272.



Home page
ajsHome page
N. P. Badertscher, R. Abart, M. Burkhard, and A. McCaig
Fluid flow pathways along the Glarus overthrust derived from stable and Sr-isotope patterns
Am J Sci, June 1, 2002; 302(6): 517 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Shattered Rock and Precarious Rock Evidence for Strong Asymmetry in Ground Motions during Thrust Faulting
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, June 1, 2001; 91(3): 441 - 447.



Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
B. Shi, A. Anooshehpoor, J. N. Brune, and Y. Zeng
Dynamics of thrust faulting: 2D lattice model
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, December 1, 1998; 88(6): 1484 - 1494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. D. Couples, H. Lewis, and P. W. Geoff Tanner
Strain partitioning during flexural-slip folding
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 127(1): 149 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. J. Walsh and J. Watterson
Geometric and kinematic coherence and scale effects in normal fault systems
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1991; 56(1): 193 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America