Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; December 1988; v. 100; no. 12; p. 1909-1933; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<1909:EOTOPC>2.3.CO;2
© 1988 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOND, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by KOMINZ, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evolution of thought on passive continental margins from the origin of geosynclinal theory (~1860) to the present

GERARD C. BOND1 and MICHELLE A. KOMINZ1

1 Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964

Most of the current views on the evolution of passive margins have roots in ideas that were developed before 1930 in the context of continental drift and geosynclinal theory. These ideas include the concept of an Atlantic type of margin formed by rifting and continental drift; the presence of a thick sedimentary deposit beneath the continental shelves; and subsidence in response to such mechanisms as crustal thinning, igneous underplating, thermal contraction, flexure, and sediment loading. As large amounts of new surface and subsurface data were acquired from modern passive margins after World War II, owing to significant advances in technology for geological and geophysical exploration of the ocean basins, these early ideas were strengthened and modified. With the development of plate-tectonic theory, the origin of passive margins as rifted trailing edges of continents became widely accepted, and significant changes in thinking involved the role of passive margins and their implications for large horizontal displacements in the evolution of geosynclines. Within the past decade, a large number of geophysical models have been developed for passive margins that focus once again on the problem of the mechanisms of vertical movements of the Earth's crust. At the same time, new developments in the acquisition and processing of data from ocean basins, especially deep-reflection data, have resulted in major new concepts about the deep structure of passive margins, including recognition of the importance of underplating and plutonic activity in the thinned rifted crust and the unexpected degree of faulting and formation of horizontal reflectors in the lower continental crust and subcrustal lithosphere.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
M. Cloos, B. Sapiie, A. Quarles van Ufford, R. J. Weiland, P. Q. Warren, and T. P. McMahon
Collisional delamination in New Guinea: The geotectonics of subducting slab breakoff
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2005; 400(0): 1 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyHome page
L. J. Pyle, L. J. Pyle, and C. R. Barnes
Upper Cambrian to Lower Silurian stratigraphic framework of platform-to-basin fades, northeastern British Columbia
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, June 1, 2000; 48(2): 123 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
M. A. Summerfield and M.A. Summerfield
Tectonic geomorphology: convergent plate boundaries, passive continental margins and supercontinent cycles
Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 1989; 13(3): 431 - 441.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America