Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; February 1989; v. 101; no. 2; p. 248-259; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0248:AROCFI>2.3.CO;2
© 1989 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PATERSON, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

A reinterpretation of conjugate folds in the central Sierra Nevada, California

SCOTT R. PATERSON1

1 Earth Science Board, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064

Conjugate folds and cleavages in the central Sierra Nevada, California, are developed in isolated domains along, or near, ductile shear zones. The conjugate folds form by rotation of older (Jurassic-Cretaceous) fabrics and removal of material along microlithon boundaries and apparently postdate all significant metamorphic events; the conjugate structures in this region are, thus, Cretaceous or Tertiary. Maximum shortening directions associated with these folds are in most cases northwest-southeast, parallel to the present strike of the Sierra Nevada.

Conjugate folds near Briceburg, California, are unusual in that they are found over a relatively large region, are associated with a well-developed crenulation cleavage, and were formed due to west-southwest-east-northeast shortening. Shortening in microlithons of as much as 34% is associated with the crenulation cleavage and formed by buckling, but with a small component of flattening, of an older fabric. Removal of material and shear along microlithon boundaries caused an unknown amount of additional shortening.

Models based on gravity relaxation, elastic recovery, and folding of fabrics in shear zones do not fully explain the orientation and style of conjugate structures in the study area. Instead, the conjugate structures reflect Cretaceous or Tertiary deformation possibly associated with movement along brittle faults. In addition, shortening directions calculated from incremental strains associated with the conjugate folds near Briceburg are in direct conflict with shortening directions based on geometries of experimentally produced conjugate structures, indicating that different mechanisms may operate during formation of experimentally and naturally formed conjugate folds.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. Zak, S. R. Paterson, and V. Memeti
Four magmatic fabrics in the Tuolumne batholith, central Sierra Nevada, California (USA): Implications for interpreting fabric patterns in plutons and evolution of magma chambers in the upper crust
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2007; 119(1-2): 184 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America