Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; November 2000; v. 112; no. 11; p. 1667-1679; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2000)112<1667:FFFAFI>2.0.CO;2
© 2000 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eichhubl, P.
Right arrow Articles by Boles, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Focused fluid flow along faults in the Monterey Formation, coastal California

Peter Eichhubl*,1 and James R. Boles*,1

1 Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA

Fluid flow in fractured siliceous mudstone of the Miocene Monterey Formation of California is inferred to be highly focused toward map-scale faults that locally contain extensive amounts of carbonate and minor silica cement. The distance of cross-stratigraphic flow, as inferred based on the strontium isotopic composition of carbonate fault cement, is close to the thickness of the Monterey Formation of 700 m in one of two study locations, Jalama Beach, and less than the formation thickness at another location, Arroyo Burro Beach. Fluid is thus derived from within the Monterey Formation rather than from underlying older units. Based on mass-balance estimates of the fluid volume required for fault cementation at Jalama Beach, the minimum distance of formation-parallel flow into the fault zone is 4 km and possibly >12 km. The inferred distance of flow parallel to the formation into this fault thus exceeds the distance of cross-formational upward flow along the fault by at least a factor of six. The mass-balance estimate requires that fluid flow along the fault is channeled into a pipe-shaped conduit rather than distributed along fault strike. Fluid flow from the surrounding formation into fault pipes is inferred to follow a radial rather than uni- or bilateral flow symmetry, using bedding-confined sets of extension fractures and stratabound breccia bodies. Radial fluid flow toward fault pipes requires fairly isotropic fracture permeability for flow along bedding and a low permeability across bedding. The inferred flow geometry illustrates the combined effect of fault permeability structure, permeability anisotropy of the surrounding formation, and hydraulic head distribution in controlling basinal fluid flow in faulted sequences.

Key Words: faults • fluids • strontium • isotopes • hydrocarbon • Monterey Formation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
P. Eichhubl, N. C. Davatz, and S. P. Becker
Structural and diagenetic control of fluid migration and cementation along the Moab fault, Utah
AAPG Bulletin, May 1, 2009; 93(5): 653 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
R. J. Davies, N. R. Goulty, and D. Meadows
Fluid flow due to the advance of basin-scale silica reaction zones
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 120(1-2): 195 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
M. R. Gross and Y. Eyal
Throughgoing fractures in layered carbonate rocks
Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2007; 119(11-12): 1387 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
M. Brown
Crustal melting and melt extraction, ascent and emplacement in orogens: mechanisms and consequences
Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2007; 164(4): 709 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
K. B. Follmi, C. Badertscher, E. de Kaenel, P. Stille, C. M. John, T. Adatte, and P. Steinmann
Phosphogenesis and organic-carbon preservation in the Miocene Monterey Formation at Naples Beach, California--The Monterey hypothesis revisited
Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2005; 117(5-6): 589 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. Brown
Synergistic effects of melting and deformation: an example from the Variscan belt, western France
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2005; 243(1): 205 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Evolution of a hydrocarbon migration pathway along basin-bounding faults: Evidence from fault cement
AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2004; 88(7): 947 - 970.



Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. B. Martin and R. A. Rymerson
A coupled fluid-inclusion and stable isotope record of paleofluids in the Monterey Formation, California
Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2002; 114(3): 269 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
I. W. Aiello, R. E. Garrison, J. C. Moore, M. Kastner, and D. S. Stakes
Anatomy and origin of carbonate structures in a Miocene cold-seep field
Geology, December 1, 2001; 29(12): 1111 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America