|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,2
1 Department of Geological Sciences, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1272
2 Department of Geology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011
The Loreto basin formed by rapid westward tilting and asymmetric subsidence within a broad releasing bend of the Loreto fault during transtensional deformation along the western margin of the active Gulf of California plate boundary. Sedimentary rocks range in age from
5(?) to 2.0 Ma and consist of siliciclastic and carbonate deposits that accumulated in nonmarine, deltaic, and marine settings. The basin is divided into the central and southeast subbasins, which have distinctly different subsidence histories and stratigraphic evolution. Sedimentary rocks of the Loreto basin are divided into four stratigraphic sequences that record discrete phases of fault-controlled subsidence and basin filling. Sequence boundaries record major changes in tilting geometries and sediment dispersal that were caused by reorganization of basin-bounding faults. Sequence 1 consists of nonmarine conglomerate and sandstone that accumulated in alluvial fans and braided streams. The sequence 12 boundary is a marine flooding surface in both subbasins, and parasequences within sequence 2 consist of progradational Gilbert deltas that are capped by transgressive marine shell concentrations and flooding surfaces. The sequence 23 boundary is a low-angle erosional unconformity in the southeast subbasin and a thin interval of downlap in the central subbasin. Sequence 3 is characterized by bioclastic limestones that were derived from the uplifted portion of the hanging-wall tilt block. The sequence 34 boundary is an angular unconformity in the southeast subbasin and an abrupt marine flooding surface in the central subbasin. Sequence 4 consists dominantly of in situ shallow-marine carbonate deposits.
By comparing parasequences of sequence 2 with marine oxygen-isotope curves, we can discriminate between eustatic and tectonic controls on stratigraphic evolution. In the central subbasin, sequence 2 accumulated during a short phase of extremely rapid subsidence (8 mm/yr); it contains 14 paracycles that do not match the O-isotope curve, and there are no unconformities. In the southeast subbasin, sequence 2 accumulated at a rate of
1.5 mm/yr; it contains 4 paracycles that appear to match the O-isotope curve, and sequence boundaries are unconformities. Thus, we conclude that during sequence 2 deposition: (1) extremely rapid subsidence in the central subbasin outpaced eustatic sea-level changes, and Gilbert delta paracycles were produced by episodic fault-controlled subsidence; and (2) subsidence in the southeast subbasin was slower than the rate of eustatic sea-level changes, and the internal stratigraphic cyclicity preserves a record of eustatic rather than tectonic events.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Lachkar, M. Guiraud, A. E. Harfi, J.-L. Dommergues, G. Dera, and C. Durlet Early Jurassic normal faulting in a carbonate extensional basin: characterization of tectonically driven platform drowning (High Atlas rift, Morocco) Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2009; 166(3): 413 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sunderlin The flora, fauna, and sediments of the Mount Dall Conglomerate (Farewell Terrane, Alaska, USA) Geological Society of America Special Papers, July 1, 2008; 442(0): 133 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Mortimer and B. Carrapa Footwall drainage evolution and scarp retreat in response to increasing fault displacement: Loreto fault, Baja California Sur, Mexico Geology, July 1, 2007; 35(7): 651 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Kim and C. Paola Long-period cyclic sedimentation with constant tectonic forcing in an experimental relay ramp Geology, April 1, 2007; 35(4): 331 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Celma, L. Ragaini, G. Cantalamessa, and W. Landini Basin physiography and tectonic influence on sequence architecture and stacking pattern: Pleistocene succession of the Canoa Basin (central Ecuador) Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2005; 117(9-10): 1226 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Massari, D. Rio, M. Sgavetti, G. Prosser, A. D'Alessandro, A. Asioli, L. Capraro, E. Fornaciari, and F. Tateo Interplay between tectonics and glacio-eustasy: Pleistocene succession of the Crotone basin, Calabria (southern Italy) Geological Society of America Bulletin, October 1, 2002; 114(10): 1183 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Umhoefer, L. Mayer, and R. J. Dorsey Evolution of the margin of the Gulf of California near Loreto, Baja California Peninsula, Mexico Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2002; 114(7): 849 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |