Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (30) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brozovic, N. Articles by Burbank, D. W. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Dynamic fluvial systems and gravel progradation in the Himalayan foreland

Nicholas Brozovic^*,1 and Douglas W. Burbank^,1

¹ Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089

Although the large-scale stratigraphy of many terrestrial foreland basins is punctuated by major episodes of gravel progradation, the relationships of such facies to hinterland tectonism and climate change are often unclear. Structural reentrants provide windows into older and more proximal parts of the foreland than are usually exposed, and thus provide key insights to earlier phases of foreland evolution. Our magnetostratigraphic studies show that, although the major lithofacies preserved within the Himachal Pradesh structural reentrant in northwestern India resemble Neogene facies in Pakistan, they have a much greater temporal and spatial variability. From 11.5 to 7 Ma, major facies boundaries in Himachal Pradesh vary by as much as 2–3 m.y. across distances of 20–30 km and are controlled by the interference between a major southeastward-flowing axial river and a major southwestward-flowing transverse river. A thick but highly confined middle to late Miocene conglomerate facies includes the oldest extensive Siwalik conglomerates yet dated (10 Ma) and implies the development of significant erosional topography along the Main Boundary thrust prior to 11 Ma. Our studies document extensive syntectonic gravel progradation with conglomerates extending tens of kilometers into the undeformed foreland during a period of increased subsidence rate and within 1–2 m.y. of major thrust initiation. Overall, gravel progradation is modulated by the interplay among subsidence, sediment supply, and the proportion of gravels in rivers entering the foreland.

Key Words: fold-and-thrust belt • basin analysis • Siwaliks • Himalaya • magnetostratigraphy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. Catlos, C. Shekhar Dubey, R. A. Marston, and T. M. Harrison Geochronologic constraints across the Main Central Thrust shear zone, Bhagirathi River (NW India): Implications for Himalayan tectonics Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 419(0): 135 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Li, Y. Li, J.-P. Zheng, and D. Han Late Mesozoic tectonic transition of the eastern North China Craton: evidence from basin-fill records Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 280(1): 239 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-L. Mugnier and P. Huyghe Ganges basin geometry records a pre-15 Ma isostatic rebound of Himalaya Geology, June 1, 2006; 34(6): 445 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Tertiary Provenance History of the Northern and Central Altiplano (Central Andes, Bolivia): A Detrital Record of Plateau-Margin Tectonics Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2002; 72(5): 711 - 726.