|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,1
1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70148, USA
2 School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahama, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
The origin of the Ouachita Mountains has been the focus of significant debate for decades. Considerable confusion also exists concerning the provenance of the Carboniferous flysch of the Ouachitas.
Trace-element geochemistry of shales from the Stanley Group delineates the provenance of the sediments and provides clues to the plate tectonic evolution of the southern continental margin during Mississippian time. Th/Sc and Cr/Th ratios indicate a cratonic source for the majority of the Stanley Group sedimentary rocks. However, in several samples, low Th/Sc ratios and high Cr/Th ratios suggest a contribution from a mafic source. Using element ratio diagrams, all of the samples plot along a curve consistent with a two-component mixing model, consisting of a dominant felsic and a subordinate mafic source.
The heavy-mineral fraction of these shales sequester many of the trace elements used in whole-rock studies. Monazite is ubiquitous in trace amounts and is the probable site for much of the rare earth elements in the whole rock. The occurrence of monazite almost exclusively in sialic igneous rocks implies that Sm/Nd isotopic signatures are not sensitive to sediment input from more mafic sources. In some Stanley shale samples, chromite and Mn oxides were identified and positively identify an oceanic crustal component as a source of Stanley Group sediment. The results of this study emphasize the importance of determining the mineralogic sites of trace elements, and realization of specific mineralogic contributions from mafic or sialic tectonic provenances.
Key Words: heavy minerals mudrocks Ouachita Mountains provenance Stanley Group trace-element analyses
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Pe-Piper, S. Triantafyllidis, and D. J. W. Piper Geochemical Identification of Clastic Sediment Provenance from Known Sources of Similar Geology: The Cretaceous Scotian Basin, Canada Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2008; 78(9): 595 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Gleason, G. E. Gehrels, W. R. Dickinson, P. J. Patchett, and D. A. Kring Laurentian Sources for Detrital Zircon Grains in Turbidite and Deltaic Sandstones of the Pennsylvanian Haymond Formation, Marathon Assemblage, West Texas, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2007; 77(11): 888 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bracciali, M. Marroni, P. Luca, and R. Sergio Geochemistry and petrography of Western Tethys Cretaceous sedimentary covers (Corsica and Northern Apennines): From source areas to configuration of margins Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 420(0): 73 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Bloch, J. M. Timmons, L. J. Crossey, G. E. Gehrels, and K. E. Karlstrom Mudstone Petrology of the Mesoproterozoic Unkar Group, Grand Canyon, U.S.A.: Provenance, Weathering, and Sediment Transport on Intracratonic Rodinia Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2006; 76(9): 1106 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |