Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tobisch, O. T. Articles by Sorensen, S. S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Steep tilting of metavolcanic rocks by multiple mechanisms, central Sierra Nevada, California

¹ Department of Earth Sciences, A232 Earth and Marine Science Building, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
² Department of Mineral Sciences, Smithsonian Institution, NHB-119, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA
³ Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 94112, USA

For 200 km along the eastern Sierra Nevada continental magmatic arc, Mesozoic metavolcanogenic rocks dip steeply to the southwest (80°), a feature that must reflect fundamental processes in magmatic-arc construction. Although tight folds can account for such steep bedding tilts, folds in the metavolcanogenic sections are sparse and small scale. We propose that the high bedding tilts were produced by a combination of thrusting, downward displacement, and ductile deformation of the beds. The last two processes accompanied emplacement of the Sierra Nevada batholith.

The Ritter Range pendant lies within this 200 km belt and provides a relatively large and well exposed Mesozoic volcanic section ranging in age from Late Triassic to mid–Cretaceous. Detailed mapping and ages from U-Pb zircon dates and fossils within the volcanic section reveal five structural blocks (I–V) that are separated by bedding-parallel thrusts, some of which are cryptic. To explain the present difference in bedding orientations between blocks III and IV, we suggest that the thrusting may have had a duplex geometry, which produced a maximum bedding dip of 45° in some blocks. Downward displacement of wall rock and ductile strain account for the remaining 35° of the observed average bedding dip (80°SW).

The exact time of thrusting and duplex formation of Late Triassic to Early Jurassic rocks in blocks I–IV is uncertain, but these structures developed either (1) between 105 and 164 Ma, well before the other rotational processes were active, or (2) mostly around 105 Ma, and closer to the time when other rotational processes were active. Much of the subsequent (ca. 91–76 Ma) bedding tilting is related to downward displacement of beds associated with the emplacement of voluminous Late Cretaceous plutons, and to regional ductile deformation of the wall rocks during that period: the majority of the tilting probably took place between ca. 91 and 86 Ma. Bedding tilts of early to mid-Cretaceous rocks in blocks IV and V is bracketed between ca. 98 and ca. 90 Ma.

Comparisons with metavolcanic sections to the northwest near Tioga Pass and to the southeast in the Mount Morrison, Mount Goddard and Oak Creek pendants, suggest that bedding rotation by thrusting(?), downward displacement and ductile strain of wall rock may explain the steep dips along this entire 200 km segment of the continental arc. Similar mechanisms may operate at midcrustal levels in other continental arcs.

Key Words: batholith • structure • volcanogenic wall rocks

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Horsman, B. Tikoff, and D. Czeck Rheological implications of heterogeneous deformation at multiple scales in the Late Cretaceous Sierra Nevada, California Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 120(1-2): 238 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Albertz, S. R. Paterson, and D. Okaya Fast strain rates during pluton emplacement: Magmatically folded leucocratic dikes in aureoles of the Mount Stuart Batholith, Washington, and the Tuolumne Intrusive Suite, California Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2005; 117(3-4): 450 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Lewis and G. H. Girty Tectonic implications of a petrographic and geochemical characterization of the Lower to Middle Jurassic Sailor Canyon Formation, northern Sierra Nevada, California Geology, July 1, 2001; 29(7): 627 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. D. Sharp, W. D. Sharp, O. T. Tobisch, and P. R. Renne Development of Cretaceous transpressional cleavage synchronous with batholith emplacement, central Sierra Nevada, California Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2000; 112(7): 1059 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]