Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; October 2001; v. 113; no. 10; p. 1282-1298; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<1282:RCAWTT>2.0.CO;2
© 2001 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickey, K.A.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, T.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Resolving complexities associated with the timing of macroscopic folds in multiply deformed terrains: The Spring Hill synform, Vermont

K.A. Hickey*,1 and T.H. Bell*,1

1 School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia

Determining the timing of macroscopic folds of bedding in multiply deformed terrains is difficult, especially for rocks that have undergone a succession of overprinting near-orthogonal deformations. The Spring Hill synform in southeast Vermont is an example of such a fold. The origin and timing of this structure has been the subject of several previous studies; understanding its development is crucial to unraveling orogenesis in the Vermont Appalachians. The fold formed during a deformation path that involved a succession of overprinting near-orthogonal deformations that produced matrix fabrics S3, S4, and S5. These foliations developed with subvertical, subhorizontal, and subvertical orientations, respectively, before being rotated by the effects of younger deformations. The Spring Hill synform is generally thought to have formed as a recumbent structure during regional nappe development, S4 developing as an axial planar foliation. However, we demonstrate that the Spring Hill synform developed as a fold with a steeply dipping axial plane that was overprinted by S4 and S5. Although this geometry and overprinting history are consistent with a D3 time of formation, we can find no change in the asymmetry of pre-S3 foliations across the fold. We suggest that the synform may have formed at a much earlier stage in the orogen's history and was subsequently modified and rotated to its present geometry by the long history of west-to-east shortening that dominated the later stages of Acadian orogenesis in southeast Vermont.

Key Words: Acadian • ductile deformation • folding • foliation • orthogonal overprinting • Vermont




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
E. BOZKURT
Extensional v. contractional origin for the southern Menderes shear zone, SW Turkey: tectonic and metamorphic implications
Geological Magazine, January 1, 2007; 144(1): 191 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
T. H. Bell and R. Newman
Appalachian orogenesis: The role of repeated gravitational collapse
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 414(0): 95 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ajsHome page
T. H. Bell and P. W. Welch
Prolonged Acadian orogenesis: Revelations from foliation intersection axis (FIA) controlled monazite dating of foliations in porphyroblasts and matrix
Am J Sci, September 1, 2002; 302(7): 549 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America