Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; February 2001; v. 113; no. 2; p. 163-181; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0163:PMCAGE>2.0.CO;2
© 2001 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timmons, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heizler, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Proterozoic multistage (ca. 1.1 and 0.8 Ga) extension recorded in the Grand Canyon Supergroup and establishment of northwest- and north-trending tectonic grains in the southwestern United States

J. Michael Timmons*,1, Karl E. Karlstrom1, Carol M. Dehler1, John W. Geissman1 and Matthew T. Heizler2

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
2 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA

The Grand Canyon Supergroup records at least two distinct periods of intracratonic extension and sedimentation in the late Mesoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic. New 40Ar/39Ar age determinations indicate that the Mesoproterozoic Unkar Group was deposited between ca. 1.2 and 1.1 Ga. Basins in which the Unkar Group was deposited and the related northwest-striking faults were created by northeast-southwest extension, which was contemporaneous with regional northwest-southeast "Grenville" contraction. New U-Pb data indicate that the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group was deposited between 800 and 742 Ma. Sedimentary and tectonic studies show that Chuar deposition took place during east-west extension and resulting normal slip across the Butte fault. This event is interpreted to be an intracratonic response to the breakup of Rodinia and initiation of the Cordilleran rift margin. Laramide monoclines of the Grand Canyon region have north and northwest trends, reactivate faults that originated at the time of Unkar and Chuar deposition, and can be traced for great distances (hundreds of kilometers) from the Grand Canyon. We use the distribution of monoclines in the Southwest to infer the extent of Proterozoic extensional fault systems. The 1.1 Ga northwest-trending structures and ca. 800–700 Ma north-trending extensional structures created regional fault networks that were tectonically inverted during formation of the Ancestral Rocky Mountains and Laramide contraction and reactivated during Tertiary extension.

Key Words: Chuar Group • Grand Canyon • growth faults • intracratonic basins • Neoproterozoic • Proterozoic rifting




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
L. J. Crossey, K. E. Karlstrom, A. E. Springer, D. Newell, D. R. Hilton, and T. Fischer
Degassing of mantle-derived CO2 and He from springs in the southern Colorado Plateau region--Neotectonic connections and implications for groundwater systems
Geological Society of America Bulletin, June 1, 2009; 121(7-8): 1034 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
F. G. Poole, G. E. Gehrels, and J. H. Stewart
Significance of detrital zircons in Upper Devonian ocean-basin strata of the Sonora allochthon and Lower Permian synorogenic strata of the Mina Mexico foredeep, central Sonora, Mexico
Geological Society of America Special Papers, July 1, 2008; 442(0): 121 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
K. Lund
Geometry of the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic rift margin of western Laurentia: Implications for mineral deposit settings
Geosphere, April 1, 2008; 4(2): 429 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
S. Mosher, J.S.F. Levine, and W.D. Carlson
Mesoproterozoic plate tectonics: A collisional model for the Grenville-aged orogenic belt in the Llano uplift, central Texas
Geology, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 55 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
S. J. Skotnicki and L. P. Knauth
The Middle Proterozoic Mescal Paleokarst, Central Arizona, U.S.A.: Karst Development, Silicification, and Cave Deposits
Journal of Sedimentary Research, December 1, 2007; 77(12): 1046 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
S. J. Whitmeyer and K. E. Karlstrom
Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America
Geosphere, August 1, 2007; 3(4): 220 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. L. Muntean, M. P. Coward, and C. A. Tarnocai
Reactivated Palaeozoic normal faults: controls on the formation of Carlin-type gold deposits in north-central Nevada
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 272(1): 571 - 587.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
W. R. Dickinson
Geotectonic evolution of the Great Basin
Geosphere, December 1, 2006; 2(7): 353 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
R. E. Sanders, M. T. Heizler, and L. B. Goodwin
40Ar/39Ar thermochronology constraints on the timing of Proterozoic basement exhumation and fault ancestry, southern Sangre de Cristo Range, New Mexico
Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2006; 118(11-12): 1489 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
S.M. Cather, K.E. Karlstrom, J.M. Timmons, and M.T. Heizler
Palinspastic reconstruction of Proterozoic basement-related aeromagnetic features in north-central New Mexico: Implications for Mesoproterozoic to late Cenozoic tectonism
Geosphere, October 1, 2006; 2(6): 299 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
J. D. Bloch, J. M. Timmons, L. J. Crossey, G. E. Gehrels, and K. E. Karlstrom
Mudstone Petrology of the Mesoproterozoic Unkar Group, Grand Canyon, U.S.A.: Provenance, Weathering, and Sediment Transport on Intracratonic Rodinia
Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2006; 76(9): 1106 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
L. J. Crossey, T. P. Fischer, P. J. Patchett, K. E. Karlstrom, D. R. Hilton, D. L. Newell, P. Huntoon, A. C. Reynolds, and G. A.M. de Leeuw
Dissected hydrologic system at the Grand Canyon: Interaction between deeply derived fluids and plateau aquifer waters in modern springs and travertine
Geology, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 25 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. M. Timmons, K. E. Karlstrom, Matthew. T. Heizler, S. A. Bowring, G. E. Gehrels, and L. J. Crossey
Tectonic inferences from the ca. 1255-1100 Ma Unkar Group and Nankoweap Formation, Grand Canyon: Intracratonic deformation and basin formation during protracted Grenville orogenesis
Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2005; 117(11-12): 1573 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
C.M. Dehler, M. Elrick, J.D. Bloch, L.J. Crossey, K.E. Karlstrom, and D.J. D. Marais
High-resolution {delta}13C stratigraphy of the Chuar Group (ca. 770-742 Ma), Grand Canyon: Implications for mid-Neoproterozoic climate change
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2005; 117(1-2): 32 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ajsHome page
P. G. DeCelles
Late Jurassic to Eocene evolution of the Cordilleran thrust belt and foreland basin system, western U.S.A.
Am J Sci, February 1, 2004; 304(2): 105 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. W. Sears and R. A. Price
Tightening the Siberian connection to western Laurentia
Geological Society of America Bulletin, August 1, 2003; 115(8): 943 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Delineation of subsurface Proterozoic Unkar and Chuar Group sedimentary basins in northern Arizona using gravity and magnetics: Implications for hydrocarbon source potential
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2003; 87(8): 1299 - 1321.



Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
K. Lund, J. N. Aleinikoff, K. V. Evans, and C. M. Fanning
SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of Neoproterozoic Windermere Supergroup, central Idaho: Implications for rifting of western Laurentia and synchroneity of Sturtian glacial deposits
Geological Society of America Bulletin, March 1, 2003; 115(3): 349 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
K. C. Condie
Supercontinents, superplumes and continental growth: the Neoproterozoic record
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 206(1): 1 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. Marshak, W. J. Nelson, and J. H. McBride
Phanerozoic strike-slip faulting in the continental interior platform of the United States: examples from the Laramide Orogen, Midcontinent, and Ancestral Rocky Mountains
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 210(1): 159 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
D.P. Elston, R.J. Enkin, J. Baker, and D.K. Kisilevsky
Tightening the Belt: Paleomagnetic-stratigraphic constraints on deposition, correlation, and deformation of the Middle Proterozoic (ca. 1.4 Ga) Belt-Purcell Supergroup, United States and Canada
Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2002; 114(5): 619 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Field GuidesHome page
E. M. Leonard, M. S. Hubbard, S. A. Kelley, E. Evanoff, C. S. Siddoway, C. G. Oviatt, M. Heizler, and M. Timmons
High Plains to Rio Grande Rift: Late Cenozoic Evolution of Central Colorado
Field Guides, January 1, 2002; 3(0): 59 - 93.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America