Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; July 2001; v. 113; no. 7; p. 895-907; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0895:RDSITM>2.0.CO;2
© 2001 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anders, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Rock deformation studies in the Mineral Mountains and Sevier Desert of west-central Utah: Implications for upper crustal low-angle normal faulting

Mark H. Anders*,1, Nicholas Christie-Blick*,1, Stewart Wills*,1 and Scot W. Krueger{dagger},2

1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964-8000, USA
2 ARCO Exploration and Production Technology, 2300 West Plano Parkway, Plano, Texas 75075, USA

The Cave Canyon detachment, a low-angle normal fault that crops out in the Mineral Mountains, west-central Utah, has been interpreted as a hanging-wall splay of a much larger structure (the Sevier Desert detachment) that was influential in development of the idea that low-angle normal faults play a role in crustal extension. The Cave Canyon detachment provides expectations for the deformational features that might be expected along the hypothesized Sevier Desert detachment, which is not exposed in outcrop and is inferred to exist primarily on the basis of seismic reflection data.

The footwall of the Cave Canyon detachment is characterized by a 200-m-thick granite cataclasite, which exhibits a clear decrease in grain size and increase in microfracture density as the fault surface is approached. Undulatory extinction in quartz and feldspar and abundant quartz deformation lamellae at distances more than 200 m from the fault surface are interpreted as related to cooling of the Miocene granite rather than to normal faulting. Although mylonitic textures have previously been described in the granite, we found no evidence for mylonitization in the footwall rocks. The hanging wall of the detachment is characterized by 9 m of deformed, partially dolomitized limestone, with a 2-m-thick carbonate mylonite at the contact. Deformation features include dynamic recrystallization, grain-size reduction, development of twinning with a strong preferred orientation, some grain-size layering, and undulatory extinction close to the fault. Static recrystallization overprints fossils and ooids at distances greater than 9 m.

Drill cuttings and some core recovered at similar distances above and below the hypothesized Sevier Desert detachment show no evidence for localized deformation (ARCO Hole-in-the-Rock No. 1, ARCO Meadow Federal No. 1, and Argonaut Energy Federal No. 1 wells). Fossils and ooids are undeformed in Paleozoic carbonate rocks within 3 m below the contact, and sandstone and conglomerate with rounded clasts lacking more than background levels of microfracturing are found in samples within 3 m above the contact. These features contrast markedly with those of the Cave Canyon detachment, which was active at a considerably shallower and cooler level in the crust (~5 km and <300 °C) than is implied for Paleozoic rocks beneath the Sevier Desert, once hanging-wall rocks are restored along the hypothesized detachment (9–14 km and 280–425 °C at the locations studied). The very different character of the two surfaces reinforces our earlier suggestion that beneath much of the Sevier Desert basin, the base of the Tertiary section is an unconformity rather than a low-angle normal fault.

Key Words: brittle rock deformation • fault zones • normal faults • Sevier Desert • Utah




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
N. Christie-Blick and M. H. Anders
Regional structure and kinematic history of the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt, central Utah: Discussion
GSA Bulletin, March 1, 2007; 119(3-4): 506 - 507.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
J. C. Coogan and P. G. DeCelles
Regional structure and kinematic history of the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt, central Utah: Reply
GSA Bulletin, March 1, 2007; 119(3-4): 508 - 512.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
N. Christie-Blick, M. H. Anders, S. Wills, C. D. Walker, and B. Renik
Observations from the Basin and Range Province (western United States) pertinent to the interpretation of regional detachment faults
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 282(1): 421 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geol Soc Am BullHome page
P. G. DeCelles and J. C. Coogan
Regional structure and kinematic history of the Sevier fold-and-thrust belt, central Utah
GSA Bulletin, July 1, 2006; 118(7-8): 841 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ajsHome page
S. Wills, M. H. Anders, and N. Christie-Blick
Pattern of Mesozoic thrust surfaces and Tertiary normal faults in the Sevier Desert subsurface, west-central Utah
Am J Sci, January 1, 2005; 305(1): 42 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America