|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Comparisons of deep seismic reflection profiles from a variety of tectonic regions that span a large fraction of the Earth's history lead to a threefold categorization of reflection patterns near the crust-mantle transition: type I patterns have no distinct reflections (including no reflection Moho at all); type II patterns have one or more subhorizontal reflections, and type III patterns have reflections that project from the crust into the mantle. Subdivisions within each of these are based upon the geometric relationships between the reflection Moho and reflections immediately above and, in some cases, below. Hence, type I examples may have essentially no reflectivity near the crust-mantle transition, or they may be characterized by crustal reflectivity that fades downward. Type II examples may have a single prominent reflection, or they may have several subhorizontal reflections. Type II patterns may also have crustal reflections that are either listric downward or that appear to be truncated at or near the base of reflectivity. Type III examples may have a single prominent reflection that projects below the Moho (as delineated by seismic refraction data), or they may have a series of subparallel dipping reflections. More than one type of reflection Moho may be visible along a single profile, sometimes changing within distances of only a few tens of kilometers. This diversity of both geometry and character leads to the conclusion that the variable appearance of the reflection Moho is a consequence of variations in the thermal and structural evolution of the crust-mantle transition at many scales from a few tens to many hundreds of kilometers.
Key Words: crust • crustal structure • Moho • Mohorovi
i
discontinuity • seismic reflection profiles
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S.-W. Dong, Q.-S. Li, R. Gao, F.-T. Liu, P.-F. Xu, X.-C. Liu, H.-M. Xue, and Y. Guan Moho-mapping in the Dabie ultrahigh-pressure collisional orogen, central China Am J Sci, April 1, 2008; 308(4): 517 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. van der Velden, C. R. van Staal, and F. A. Cook Crustal structure, fossil subduction, and the tectonic evolution of the Newfoundland Appalachians: Evidence from a reprocessed seismic reflection survey Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2004; 116(11-12): 1485 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Xue-Cheng, S. L. Klemperer, T. Wen-Bang, L. Lai-Xiang, and E. Chetwin Crustal structure and exhumation of the Dabie Shan ultrahigh-pressure orogen, eastern China, from seismic reflection profiling Geology, May 1, 2003; 31(5): 435 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M. Brocher, T. Parsons, A. M. Trehu, C. M. Snelson, and M. A. Fisher Seismic evidence for widespread serpentinized forearc upper mantle along the Cascadia margin Geology, March 1, 2003; 31(3): 267 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
