Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, J. B. Articles by Rymerson, R. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A coupled fluid-inclusion and stable isotope record of paleofluids in the Monterey Formation, California

¹ Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, 241 Williamson Hall, P.O. Box 112120, Gainesville, Florida 32611- 2120, USA

Determining the history of fossil hydrologic systems that is recorded in vein minerals can be complicated by heterogeneity in the oxygen and carbon isotope compositions at millimeter and smaller scales. Several samples of diagenetic dolomite from two location in the Miocene Monterey Formation, California, have ¹⁸O and ¹³C values that vary over a few millimeters by 28 and 6.5, respectively (relative to the Pee Dee belemnite isotope standard). These variations reflect episodic flow and mixing of waters from different sources with distinct diagenetic histories. On the other hand, isotopic conpositions of dolomite in samples with gradual shifts in isotopic compositions and correlated ¹⁸O and ¹³C values may have been controlled by mass diffusion and thermal conduction between episodic flow events.

Primary fluid-inclusion assemblages from samples collected at one location yielded homogenization temperatures of 87.8 ± 3.6 °C (2). These temperatures were combined with measured ¹⁸O values very nearly collocated in each dolomite sample to show that ¹⁸O_water values ranged between –0.8 and +2.5 (relative to standard mean ocean water). The samples from this Monterey Formation dolomite thus indicate their precipitation from water more enriched in ¹⁸O than late Miocene and younger seawater and must reflect modification of the ¹⁸O values of the involved waters by mineral-dehydration reactions prior to dolomite precipitation. Samples from the other location contain no primary fluid- inclusion assemblages and few abrupt shifts in isotopic compositions, perhaps reflecting recrystallization.

Small-scale variations in isotopic compositions of vein minerals could be interpreted as the result of a changing regional hydrologic pattern, but we think such an interpretation for the Monterey Formation samples would be incorrect. Instead, we infer that these variations provide important information about localized effects on the ancient hydrologic system and that these effects bear on the origins of the paleofluids responsible for the mineral precipitation.

Key Words: dolomite • fluid flow • fluid inclusions • Monterey Formation • stable isotopes

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Evolution of a hydrocarbon migration pathway along basin-bounding faults: Evidence from fault cement AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2004; 88(7): 947 - 970.