Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; April 2002; v. 114; no. 4; p. 490-496; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2002)114<0490:GIOSSF>2.0.CO;2
© 2002 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zimbelman, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geochemical indicators of separate sources for eolian sands in the eastern Mojave Desert, California, and western Arizona

James R. Zimbelman*,1 and Steven H. Williams{dagger},2

1 Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0315, USA
2 Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, 5415 Mark Dabling Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80918, USA

Low, stabilized sand dunes cover much of the Cactus and La Posa Plains in western Arizona, near the town of Parker. The provenance of the dunes is not well defined, and it had been hypothesized that they were possibly related to extensive eolian sand deposits in the eastern Mojave Desert of California, on the other side of the Colorado River. Major oxide analyses of bulk sand samples collected from southeastern California and western Arizona show clear chemical differences. The Mojave sands all have SiO2 < 79 wt%, Al2O3 > 10 wt%, and Na2O + K2O > 5 wt%, whereas the Colorado River and Arizona sands have SiO2 > 81 wt%, Al2O3 < 6 wt%, and Na2O + K2O < 4 wt%. These results show that the stabilized dunes near Parker are chemically indistinguishable from Colorado River sands. The chemical differences between the southeastern California sands and the western Arizona sands are supported by X-ray diffraction results that indicate these two sand populations have significant differences in the relative abundance of quartz and feldspar. Our data also indicate a near-source origin for the Mojave sands, whereas the Colorado River and Arizona sands have undergone more prolonged chemical weathering. The major oxide results are consistent with published trace element studies by others that clearly distinguished between mature and immature sands in California and Colorado. The quartz/feldspar ratio may be amenable to measurement by some advanced remote-sensing instruments.

Key Words: deserts • eolian • geochemistry • sand • sand dunes • sediment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
J. E. Spencer, P. A. Pearthree, and P. K. House
An evaluation of the evolution of the latest Miocene to earliest Pliocene Bouse lake system in the lower Colorado River valley, southwestern USA
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2008; 439(0): 375 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
J. E. Bullard
Arid geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, March 1, 2004; 28(1): 130 - 144.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America