|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,1
,2
1 Department of Geology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
2 Department of Geological Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L3N6, Canada
Newly available geological and geophysical data tighten the Proterozoic connection between the rifted margins of the northern Siberian craton and western Laurentia, and permit a Siberia-Laurentia-Australia troika, with northern Australia connected to the southern margin of the Siberian craton. The continental assembly is linked by a prominent 2.01.8 Ga collisional belt and the ca. 1.31.0 Ga Grenville orogen. The reconstruction also aligns a 1.51.45 Ga dike/sill swarm that extends from the Wyoming province, through the Belt-Purcell basin, into the northern Siberian craton. Separation of Australia and Siberia may have occurred by the early Neoproterozoic, but separation of Siberia and Laurentia may not have been completed until the Early Cambrian. Continental extension began along the zigzag Siberia-Laurentia rift zone in the early Mesoproterozoic. Rift-related igneous and sedimentary assemblages dated at ca. 1.5, 1.38, and 1.2 to 1.0 Ga correlate across the reconstructed Siberia-Laurentia rift zone. Renewed rifting in the Neoproterozoic and Vendian culminated with seafloor spreading and thermal subsidence of the conjugate rift shoulders. Correlative archeocyathan reefs, endemic olenellid trilobite fauna, and exchange of detritus between the cratons imply that the rift may have remained relatively narrow until the Atdabanian stage. Black sulfidic shales buried the archeocyathan reefs on the rapidly subsiding rift margins during the Botomian Sinsk event.
Key Words: Laurentia, Cordillera Siberia Rodinia plate reconstruction Proterozoic
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. V. Jones III, J. N. Connelly, K. E. Karlstrom, M. L. Williams, and M. F. Doe Age, provenance, and tectonic setting of Paleoproterozoic quartzite successions in the southwestern United States Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2009; 121(1-2): 247 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Snyder, M. Pilkington, R. M. Clowes, and F. A. Cook The underestimated Proterozoic component of the Canadian Cordillera accretionary margin Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 318(1): 257 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Lund Geometry of the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic rift margin of western Laurentia: Implications for mineral deposit settings Geosphere, April 1, 2008; 4(2): 429 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Whitmeyer and K. E. Karlstrom Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America Geosphere, August 1, 2007; 3(4): 220 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.W. Sears Belt-Purcell Basin: Keystone of the Rocky Mountain fold-and-thrust belt, United States and Canada Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): 147 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.W. Sears, T. A. Harms, and C. A. Evenchick Whence the mountains? The contributions of Raymond A. Price Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 433(0): xi - xviii. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Dickinson Geotectonic evolution of the Great Basin Geosphere, December 1, 2006; 2(7): 353 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Fanning and P. K. Link U-Pb SHRIMP ages of Neoproterozoic (Sturtian) glaciogenic Pocatello Formation, southeastern Idaho Geology, October 1, 2004; 32(10): 881 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |