Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; September 2003; v. 115; no. 9; p. 1110-1121; DOI: 10.1130/B25265.1
© 2003 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benda, L.
Right arrow Articles by Black, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Debris flows as agents of morphological heterogeneity at low-order confluences, Olympic Mountains, Washington

Lee Benda{dagger},1, Curt Veldhuisen{ddagger},2 and Jenelle Black§,3

1 Earth Systems Institute, 310 North Mount Shasta Boulevard, Suite 6, Mount Shasta, California 96067, USA
2 Skagit System Cooperative, 25944 Community Plaza Way, Sedro Woolley, Washington 98284, USA
3 Hart Crowser Incorporated, 1257 Main Street, Fortuna, California 95540, USA

Effects of tributary junctions on longitudinal patterns of riverine heterogeneity are relevant to both fluvial geomorphology and riverine ecology. We surveyed 10 km of small- to moderate-sized mountain channels in the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, to investigate how low-order confluences prone to debris flow deposition directly and indirectly influenced channel and valley morphology. In the Olympic Mountains, debris flows scour sediment and organic material from steep first- and second-order channels and create deposits (debris fans) at tributary junctions in higher-order streams. In lower-energy depositional environments there were statistically significant relationships among debris fans at low-order confluences and gravel substrate, wide channels, and numbers of logs and large pools. Effects of debris fans on channel morphology extended upstream and downstream of fan perimeters, indicating the importance of indirect (offsite) effects of debris flows. Consequently, certain aspects of channel morphology (e.g., pool density, substrate texture, and channel widths) were nonuniformly distributed, reflecting the role of network topology and disturbance history on the spatial scale of morphological heterogeneity. Moreover, heterogeneity of channel morphology increased in proximity to low-order confluences prone to debris flows. In contrast, confluence effects in higher-energy depositional environments were limited. Our field data and information from seven other studies indicate how variation in debris flow volume and composition, stream energy, and valley width at the point of deposition influence the relationship between low-order confluences and channel morphology.

Key Words: slope stability • fluvial geomorphology • debris flows • natural hazards




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
K. Hewitt
Glacially conditioned rock-slope failures and disturbance-regime landscapes, Upper Indus Basin, northern Pakistan
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 320(1): 235 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
D. F. Hoffman and E. J. Gabet
Effects of sediment pulses on channel morphology in a gravel-bed river
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2007; 119(1-2): 116 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
R. J. Hardy
Fluvial geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, September 1, 2005; 29(3): 411 - 425.
[PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America