|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,1
,2
,3
,4
1 Department of Geology, Indiana UniversityPurdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA
2 U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
3 Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
4 Department of Geology, Indiana UniversityPurdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA
The timing of deposition of fluvial sediments now forming the >7-km-thick McCoy Mountains Formation is one of the key uncertainties in reconstructing the Mesozoic paleogeography of southern California and western Arizona. Ion-microprobe U-Pb geochronologic data for individual zircons from nine sandstones from the McCoy Mountains type section and six associated igneous rocks provide significant new constraints on the tectonic setting and the timing of deposition within the northwest-trending McCoy basin. U-Pb zircon data from a metavolcanic rock of the underlying Dome Rock sequence in the Palen Mountains confirm that the McCoy Mountains Formation was deposited after regional Middle to Late Jurassic arc magmatism. U-Pb zircon data from a Late Cretaceous granodiorite intruding the formation in the Coxcomb Mountains confirm that the formation was deformed and metamorphosed prior to 73.5 ± 1.3 Ma. Populations of detrital zircons vary systematically with both rock type and stratigraphic height; lithic arkoses predominantly derived from the west have consistently more abundant younger zircons than do litharenite sandstones predominantly derived from the north, and the youngest zircons yield maximum depositional ages that decrease from 116 Ma near the base to 84 Ma near the top of the section. The detrital-zircon data permit a Late Jurassic age for the basal, comparatively quartz-rich sandstone. However, the data further suggest that >90% of the formation was deposited between middle Early and middle Late Cretaceous time. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that most of the McCoy Mountains Formation represents a retroarc foreland basin, deposited behind the active, evolving Cretaceous Cordilleran continental- margin magmatic arc that lay to the west and in the foreland of the actively deforming Cretaceous Maria fold-and-thrust belt.
Key Words: California stratigraphy tectonics geochronology geochemistry
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. R. Dickinson, T. F. Lawton, and G. E. Gehrels Recycling detrital zircons: A case study from the Cretaceous Bisbee Group of southern Arizona Geology, June 1, 2009; 37(6): 503 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Lawton, I. A. Bradford, F. J. Vega, G. E. Gehrels, and J. M. Amato Provenance of Upper Cretaceous-Paleogene sandstones in the foreland basin system of the Sierra Madre Oriental, northeastern Mexico, and its bearing on fluvial dispersal systems of the Mexican Laramide Province Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2009; 121(5-6): 820 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V.E. Langenheim and R.E. Powell Basin geometry and cumulative offsets in the Eastern Transverse Ranges, southern California: Implications for transrotational deformation along the San Andreas fault system Geosphere, February 1, 2009; 5(1): 1 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Wells and T. D. Hoisch The role of mantle delamination in widespread Late Cretaceous extension and magmatism in the Cordilleran orogen, western United States Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2008; 120(5-6): 515 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Spencer, G. R. Smith, and T. E. Dowling Middle to late Cenozoic geology, hydrography, and fish evolution in the American Southwest Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2008; 439(0): 279 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Barth, J. L. Anderson, C. E. Jacobson, S. R. Paterson, and J. L. Wooden Magmatism and tectonics in a tilted crustal section through a continental arc, eastern Transverse Ranges and southern Mojave Desert Field Guides, January 1, 2008; 11(0): 101 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Wright and S. J. Wyld Alternative tectonic model for Late Jurassic through Early Cretaceous evolution of the Great Valley Group, California Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 419(0): 81 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |