Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; May 2004; v. 116; no. 5-6; p. 637-654; DOI: 10.1130/B25340.1
© 2004 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hourigan, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Akinin, V. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Tectonic and chronostratigraphic implications of new 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and geochemistry of the Arman and Maltan-Ola volcanic fields, Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt, northeastern Russia

Jeremy K. Hourigan{dagger},1 and Vyacheslav V. Akinin{ddagger},2

1 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
2 North East Interdisciplinary Scientific Research Institute, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Magadan, Portovaya Ulitsa, 16, 685000, Russia

The Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt is part of an extensive late Early to Late Cretaceous Andean-style magmatic arc that spans the entire eastern margin of the Asian continent. The belt itself stretches 3000 km from the Chukotka Peninsula to the Uda River and comprises ~1.2 x 106 km3 of volcanic rock over a 500,000 km2 area. Despite its size and regional tectonic significance, the time span of magmatic activity is poorly constrained and the subject of significant debate, mostly in the Russian literature. In this paper, we provide new geochronologic control on the timing of inception and cessation of magmatism for the Arman and Maltan-Ola volcanic fields. These field localities were chosen because they are well studied, relatively accessible, and contain floral assemblages that have been used to correlate volcanic sequences at the regional scale. The majority of the volcanic sequence was emplaced between 85.5 ± 1.3 Ma and 74.0 ± 1.2 Ma, as shown by 17 new 40Ar/39Ar ages. The Coniacian– Santonian to Campanian age range indicated is 15 m.y. younger than the Albian to early Cenomanian age range given by a synthesis of floral stratigraphic, K-Ar, and Rb-Sr geochronologic data. The calc- alkaline part of the volcanic section spans an apparent age range of 85.5 ± 1.3 Ma to 80.7 ± 0.8 Ma. Capping basalts were emplaced between 77.5 ± 1.1 Ma and 74.0 ± 1.2 Ma and exhibit a within-plate geochemical signature, which we attribute to a temporally and geochemically distinct, possibly extension-related, phase of magmatism. The apparent northwestward migration of the arc front from the interior (seaward) zone (Taigonos Peninsula, Magadan batholith) in Albian–Cenomanian time to the Arman and Maltan-Ola volcanic fields in Coniacian–Santonian to Campanian time may be explained by shallowing of the subducting paleo-Pacific (Kula?) oceanic plate.

The flat-lying nature of these volcanic rocks and the within-plate geochemical affinity of the capping basalt unit are inconsistent with prevailing tectonic models for the cessation of arc magmatism and formation of the Sea of Okhotsk which require the collision of a microcontinental block or oceanic plateau with the northeast Asian margin in the Late Cretaceous.

Key Words: Okhotsk-Chukotka volcanic belt • northeast Russia • geochronology • Cretaceous • subduction-related magmatism




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ajsHome page
J. K. Hourigan, M. T. Brandon, A. V. Soloviev, A. B. Kirmasov, J. I. Garver, J. Stevenson, and P. W. Reiners
Eocene arc-continent collision and crustal consolidation in Kamchatka, Russian Far East
Am J Sci, May 1, 2009; 309(5): 333 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. Ntaflos, C. Tschegg, M. Coltorti, V. V. Akinin, and J. Kosler
Asthenospheric signature in fertile spinel lherzolites from the Viliga Volcanic Field in NE Russia
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 293(1): 57 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America