Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; July 2004; v. 116; no. 7-8; p. 802-816; DOI: 10.1130/B25308.1
© 2004 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tooth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nanson, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Forms and processes of two highly contrasting rivers in arid central Australia, and the implications for channel-pattern discrimination and prediction

Stephen Tooth{dagger},1 and Gerald C. Nanson{dagger},2

1 Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, UK
2 School of Geosciences, University of Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia

Description and quantification of the diverse controls on alluvial-river styles have long been key themes in the fluvial literature, but many uncertainties and contentions remain. On the Northern Plains in arid central Australia, ephemeral rivers are commonly low sinuosity (P < 1.15) but vary from single thread to anabranching, thus providing an opportunity to examine concepts of channel-pattern discrimination and prediction. Comparison of the closely adjacent middle reaches of the Plenty and Marshall Rivers demonstrates that although channel-bed gradient, discharge, and bank strength are essentially similar, bed-material caliber and the pattern of tributary drainage are markedly different. These differences result in strong contrasts in channel cross-sectional geometry and planform. The Plenty River, which transports medium to coarse sand and is joined by few tributaries, remains predominantly single thread but is variably wide (~100–1200 m) and in places appears transitional to braiding. By contrast, the Marshall River, which transports coarse sand to granules and is joined by several minor tributaries, has numerous narrow (usually <60 m wide), anabranching channels that divide around vegetated ridges and broader islands.

It is important to note that whereas channel-pattern discrimination diagrams predict that hydraulic, sedimentary, and energy conditions are conducive to the development of meandering or braiding on these rivers, both the Plenty and the individual Marshall anabranches remain essentially single-thread, planar-bed, low-sinuosity ("straight") channels. This fact appears to be due primarily to the high degree of bank strength provided by riparian vegetation and secondarily to certain flow and sediment-transport conditions characteristic of these ephemeral rivers. In particular, field observations and theoretical model results suggest that (1) a wide, single-thread channel relatively free of in-channel trees is sufficient to convey a sandy bed-material load (the Plenty), but (2) where tributaries provide small supplies of water that encourage the growth of obstructing in-channel trees or introduce some additional coarse sediment, then the formation of narrow anabranches minimizes flow roughness and maintains sediment throughput (the Marshall). Hence, although major changes in fluvial processes can be produced by subtle differences in water and sediment supply, the resulting channel patterns cannot be predicted by traditional discrimination diagrams that are based solely on simple combinations of morphometric, hydraulic, and/or sedimentary variables.

Key Words: anabranching • channel pattern • dryland river • ephemeral flow • riparian vegetation • sediment transport




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
S. Tooth
Arid geomorphology: emerging research themes and new frontiers
Progress in Physical Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 251 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
S. Tooth, J. D. Jansen, G. C. Nanson, T. J. Coulthard, and T. Pietsch
Riparian vegetation and the late Holocene development of an anabranching river: Magela Creek, northern Australia
Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 120(7-8): 1021 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
S. Tooth
Arid geomorphology: recent progress from an Earth System Science perspective
Progress in Physical Geography, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 81 - 101.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
C. P. North, G. C. Nanson, and S. D. Fagan
Recognition of the Sedimentary Architecture of Dryland Anabranching (Anastomosing) Rivers
Journal of Sedimentary Research, November 1, 2007; 77(11): 925 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
C. P. North and G. L. Warwick
Fluvial Fans: Myths, Misconceptions, and the End of the Terminal-Fan Model
Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2007; 77(9): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Physical GeographyHome page
J. E. Bullard
Arid geomorphology
Progress in Physical Geography, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 542 - 552.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
S. Tooth
Splay Formation Along the Lower Reaches of Ephemeral Rivers on the Northern Plains of Arid Central Australia
Journal of Sedimentary Research, July 1, 2005; 75(4): 636 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America