|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,1
,11 Department of Geological and Environmental Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115, USA
Faults in sandstone are frequently composed of two classes of structures: (1) deformation bands and (2) joints and sheared joints. Whereas the former structures are associated with cataclastic deformation, the latter ones represent brittle fracturing, fragmentation, and brecciation. We investigated the distribution of these structures, their formation, and the underlying mechanical controls for their occurrence along the Moab normal fault in southeastern Utah through the use of structural mapping and numerical elastic boundary element modeling. We found that deformation bands occur everywhere along the fault, but with increased density in contractional relays. Joints and sheared joints only occur at intersections and extensional relays. In all locations, joints consistently overprint deformation bands. Localization of joints and sheared joints in extensional relays suggests that their distribution is controlled by local variations in stress state that are due to mechanical interaction between the fault segments. This interpretation is consistent with elastic boundary element models that predict a local reduction in mean stress and least compressive principal stress at intersections and extensional relays. The transition from deformation band to joint formation along these sections of the fault system likely resulted from the combined effects of changes in remote tectonic loading, burial depth, fluid pressure, and rock properties. In the case of the Moab fault, we conclude that the structural heterogeneity in the fault zone is systematically related to the geometric evolution of the fault, the local state of stress associated with fault slip, and the remote loading history. Because the type and distribution of structures affect fault permeability and strength, our results predict systematic variations in these parameters with fault evolution.
Key Words: deformation band joint Moab fault mechanics stress sheared joint
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Ferrill, A. P. Morris, and R. N. McGinnis Crossing conjugate normal faults in field exposures and seismic data AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1471 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Eichhubl, N. C. Davatz, and S. P. Becker Structural and diagenetic control of fluid migration and cementation along the Moab fault, Utah AAPG Bulletin, May 1, 2009; 93(5): 653 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rotevatn, J. Tveranger, J. A. Howell, and H. Fossen Dynamic investigation of the effect of a relay ramp on simulated fluid flow: geocellular modelling of the Delicate Arch Ramp, Utah Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2009; 15(1): 45 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Schultz and H. Fossen Terminology for structural discontinuities AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 92(7): 853 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fredman, J. Tveranger, S. Semshaug, A. Braathen, and E. Sverdrup Sensitivity of fluid flow to fault core architecture and petrophysical properties of fault rocks in siliciclastic reservoirs: a synthetic fault model study Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2007; 13(4): 305 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Maerten and F. Maerten Chronologic modeling of faulted and fractured reservoirs using geomechanically based restoration: Technique and industry applications AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2006; 90(8): 1201 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Fossen, T. E. S. Johansen, J. Hesthammer, and A. Rotevatn Fault interaction in porous sandstone and implications for reservoir management; examples from southern Utah AAPG Bulletin, December 1, 2005; 89(12): 1593 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |