Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; January 2005; v. 117; no. 1-2; p. 135-148; DOI: 10.1130/B25473.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davatzes, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Aydin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Structural evolution of fault zones in sandstone by multiple deformation mechanisms: Moab fault, southeast Utah

Nicholas C. Davatzes{dagger},1, Peter Eichhubl{ddagger},1 and Atilla Aydin1

1 Department of Geological and Environmental Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115, USA

Faults in sandstone are frequently composed of two classes of structures: (1) deformation bands and (2) joints and sheared joints. Whereas the former structures are associated with cataclastic deformation, the latter ones represent brittle fracturing, fragmentation, and brecciation. We investigated the distribution of these structures, their formation, and the underlying mechanical controls for their occurrence along the Moab normal fault in southeastern Utah through the use of structural mapping and numerical elastic boundary element modeling. We found that deformation bands occur everywhere along the fault, but with increased density in contractional relays. Joints and sheared joints only occur at intersections and extensional relays. In all locations, joints consistently overprint deformation bands. Localization of joints and sheared joints in extensional relays suggests that their distribution is controlled by local variations in stress state that are due to mechanical interaction between the fault segments. This interpretation is consistent with elastic boundary element models that predict a local reduction in mean stress and least compressive principal stress at intersections and extensional relays. The transition from deformation band to joint formation along these sections of the fault system likely resulted from the combined effects of changes in remote tectonic loading, burial depth, fluid pressure, and rock properties. In the case of the Moab fault, we conclude that the structural heterogeneity in the fault zone is systematically related to the geometric evolution of the fault, the local state of stress associated with fault slip, and the remote loading history. Because the type and distribution of structures affect fault permeability and strength, our results predict systematic variations in these parameters with fault evolution.

Key Words: deformation band • joint • Moab fault • mechanics • stress • sheared joint




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
D. A. Ferrill, A. P. Morris, and R. N. McGinnis
Crossing conjugate normal faults in field exposures and seismic data
AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1471 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
P. Eichhubl, N. C. Davatz, and S. P. Becker
Structural and diagenetic control of fluid migration and cementation along the Moab fault, Utah
AAPG Bulletin, May 1, 2009; 93(5): 653 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
A. Rotevatn, J. Tveranger, J. A. Howell, and H. Fossen
Dynamic investigation of the effect of a relay ramp on simulated fluid flow: geocellular modelling of the Delicate Arch Ramp, Utah
Petroleum Geoscience, February 1, 2009; 15(1): 45 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. A. Schultz and H. Fossen
Terminology for structural discontinuities
AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 92(7): 853 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
N. Fredman, J. Tveranger, S. Semshaug, A. Braathen, and E. Sverdrup
Sensitivity of fluid flow to fault core architecture and petrophysical properties of fault rocks in siliciclastic reservoirs: a synthetic fault model study
Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2007; 13(4): 305 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
L. Maerten and F. Maerten
Chronologic modeling of faulted and fractured reservoirs using geomechanically based restoration: Technique and industry applications
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2006; 90(8): 1201 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
H. Fossen, T. E. S. Johansen, J. Hesthammer, and A. Rotevatn
Fault interaction in porous sandstone and implications for reservoir management; examples from southern Utah
AAPG Bulletin, December 1, 2005; 89(12): 1593 - 1606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America