Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; March 2005; v. 117; no. 3-4; p. 369-382; DOI: 10.1130/B25484.1
© 2005 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Keating, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Photogrammetric techniques for analyzing displacement, strain, and structural geometry in physical models: Application to the growth of monoclinal basement uplifts

Mark P. Fischer{dagger},1 and David P. Keating1

1 Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115-2854, USA

Physical models have been widely used to study geological structures for more than one hundred years. The greatest benefit of physical models is that with proper scaling of model dimensions and materials, researchers can directly observe structural or tectonic processes that take millions of years to occur naturally. Despite this benefit, however, use of physical models is not widespread because their construction and analysis is commonly labor-intensive work that yields largely qualitative information on structural geometry and limited quantitative information on displacement and strain. This paper describes how close-range photogrammetry can be used to obtain quantitative information on the geometry, displacement, and strain patterns in an evolving physical model. The technique is an inexpensive, high-resolution, noninvasive, and efficient method that uses standard commercial software and a digital camera to determine the x, y, z positions of high-contrast markers placed on the model surface. The model geometry at any given time is defined by the positions of all the markers, whereas strain and displacement are obtained by comparing, or tracking, the positions of the markers at different times during an experiment. We present as an example application of the technique, an analysis of scaled physical models of monoclines that form above basement-involved reverse faults with differing displacement distributions. Using close-range photogrammetry, we are able to link fault displacement and lateral propagation history to unique, evolving, three-dimensional (3-D) geometries and deformation patterns that are unlikely to be revealed by other analysis techniques.

Key Words: physical model • monocline • basement uplift • photogrammetry • strain




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
J. Tetreault, C. H. Jones, E. Erslev, S. Larson, M. Hudson, and S. Holdaway
Paleomagnetic and structural evidence for oblique slip in a fault-related fold, Grayback monocline, Colorado
Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 120(7-8): 877 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
D. P. Keating and M. P. Fischer
An experimental evaluation of the curvature-strain relation in fault-related folds
AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 92(7): 869 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America