Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by North, C. P. Articles by Jones, D. G. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Geochemical correlation in deltaic successions: A reality check

Colin P. North^,1, Malcolm J. Hole¹ and Daniel G. Jones¹

¹ Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Meston Building, King's College, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland, UK

Whol-rock geochemical analysis can aid the stratigraphic correlation of faunally barren successions. Compared to petrographic techniques or heavy-mineral separations, such analysis is quick and objective, yet rarely has the reliability of the method been tested against unequivocal correlations. We have applied it to the Kenilworth Member of the Upper Cretaceous Blackhawk Formation, a well-exposed and easily correlated 100-m-thick unit in the deltaic successions of the Book Cliffs, Utah, United States. This is the first evaluation of geochemical analysis as an aid to sequence stratigraphic interpretation at the parasequence scale.

From the geochemistry alone, it is not possible with statistical confidence to separate individual parasequences or systems tracts nor the fluvial incised valley from the marine shoreface units. The magnitude of geochemical variation in a single sandstone bed over a 30 m lateral traverse is as great as vertically through an entire parasequence. Y, Nb, Rb, and Ti abundances are inversely correlated with grain size. Thus geochemical signatures follow sedimentological trends, and distal parts of a parasequence appear distinct from proximal parts. Y ratios compensate for this grain size effect but introduce confusing distortions for elements such as Zr that are not correlated with grain size. Contrary to some predictions, Zr is as common in the finest-grained units as the coarsest, and Sr is not correlated with Ca. In some sections Sr is also inversely correlated to grain size and cannot be used as an indicator for cement abundance.

Key Words: correlation • geochemistry • deltas • sequence stratigraphy • Cretaceous • Book Cliffs

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. V. Zwanzig, H. V. Zwanzig, J. J. Macek, and C. R. McGregor Lithostratigraphy and Geochemistry of the High-Grade Metasedimentary Rocks in the Thompson Nickel Belt and Adjacent Kisseynew Domain, Manitoba: Implications for Nickel Exploration Economic Geology, November 1, 2007; 102(7): 1197 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]