Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; November 2006; v. 118; no. 11-12; p. 1412-1430; DOI: 10.1130/B25923.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matzel, J. E.P.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Time scales of pluton construction at differing crustal levels: Examples from the Mount Stuart and Tenpeak intrusions, North Cascades, Washington

Jennifer E.P. Matzel{dagger},1, Samuel A. Bowring1 and Robert B. Miller2

1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
2 Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, California 95192, USA

Deciphering the magmatic history of continental magmatic arcs, in general, and the growth history of individual intrusions, in particular, is key to understanding the complex history of magma generation, segregation, and transport that define the dynamics of crustal growth. We utilize high precision U-Pb geochronology to resolve a detailed magmatic history from two composite intrusions, the 2–4 kbar Mount Stuart batholith and the 7–10 kbar Tenpeak pluton, emplaced in the Cretaceous North Cascades arc. This temporal framework provides a way to evaluate models of pluton growth that explain common features of intrusions such as concentric compositional zoning and internal magmatic contacts. U-Pb zircon crystallization ages were obtained from 12 samples of the Mount Stuart batholith and 8 samples of the Tenpeak intrusion, representing the range of compositional diversity and geographical extent.

These dates indicate that the Mount Stuart batholith was constructed over a ~5.5 m.y. time period that was punctuated by four intervals of high magma flux. The durations of the high-flux periods are short (a few hundred thousand years) relative to the duration of the batholith. The consistent pattern of magmatic fabrics and the lack of distinct contacts in the batholith may be explained by the juxtaposition of melt-rich and mush zones with subtle contacts between mineralogically and texturally similar tonalite and time-transgressive magma fabrics.

In contrast, the Tenpeak intrusion was constructed over a ~2.6 m.y. time period, with magma influx distributed throughout the intrusive history and texturally distinct magma bodies. The Tenpeak intrusion lacks distinct age domains, which suggests that any magma reservoir was smaller in size and potentially more ephemeral.

Although the distinct age domains and discrete compositional and textural phases indicate that pluton growth occurred incrementally, neither pluton bears resemblance to a purely end-member incremental growth model whereby a pluton is constructed from hundreds to thousands of discrete magma pulses that have little, if any, interaction. In particular, ages from the youngest domain of the Mount Stuart batholith indicate that a melt-rich magma reservoir of ≥520 km3 existed over a 170 ± 90 k.y. time span.

Key Words: geochronology • magma reservoir • plutons • time scales • crustal origin




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
R. F. Weinberg, G. Mark, and H. Reichardt
Magma ponding in the Karakoram shear zone, Ladakh, NW India
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2009; 121(1-2): 278 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
J. L. Anderson, A. P. Barth, J. L. Wooden, and F. Mazdab
Thermometers and Thermobarometers in Granitic Systems
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 69(1): 121 - 142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. F. Zellmer and C. Annen
An introduction to magma dynamics
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 304(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
W. H. Hirt
Petrology of the Mount Whitney Intrusive Suite, eastern Sierra Nevada, California: Implications for the emplacement and differentiation of composite felsic intrusions
Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2007; 119(9-10): 1185 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
M. Brown
Crustal melting and melt extraction, ascent and emplacement in orogens: mechanisms and consequences
Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2007; 164(4): 709 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
P. W. Lipman
Incremental assembly and prolonged consolidation of Cordilleran magma chambers: Evidence from the Southern Rocky Mountain volcanic field
Geosphere, February 1, 2007; 3(1): 42 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America