Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Browning, J. V. Articles by Hernández, J. C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Quantification of the effects of eustasy, subsidence, and sediment supply on Miocene sequences, mid-Atlantic margin of the United States

James V. Browning^,1, Kenneth G. Miller¹, Peter P. McLaughlin², Michelle A. Kominz³, Peter J. Sugarman⁴, Donald Monteverde⁴, Mark D. Feigenson⁵ and John C. Hernández⁵

¹ Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
² Delaware Geological Survey, DGS Building, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA
³ Department of Geosciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008-5150, USA
⁴ New Jersey Geological Survey, P.O. Box 427, Trenton, New Jersey 08625, USA
⁵ Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA

We use backstripping to quantify the roles of variations in global sea level (eustasy), subsidence, and sediment supply on the development of the Miocene stratigraphic record of the mid-Atlantic continental margin of the United States (New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland). Eustasy is a primary influence on sequence patterns, determining the global template of sequences (i.e., times when sequences can be preserved) and explaining similarities in Miocene sequence architecture on margins throughout the world. Sequences canbecorrelatedthroughoutthemid-Atlantic region with Sr-isotopic chronology (±0.6 m.y. to ±1.2 m.y.). Eight Miocene sequences correlate regionally and can be correlated to global ¹⁸O increases, indicating glacioeustatic control. This margin is dominated by passive subsidence with little evidence for active tectonic overprints, except possibly in Maryland during the early Miocene. However, early Miocene sequences in New Jersey and Delaware display a patchwork distribution that is attributable to minor (tens of meters) intervals of excess subsidence. Backstripping quantifies that excess subsidence began in Delaware at ca. 21 Ma and continued until 12 Ma, with maximum rates from ca. 21–16 Ma. We attribute this enhanced subsidence to local flexural response to the progradation of thick sequences offshore and adjacent to this area. Removing this excess subsidence in Delaware yields a record that is remarkably similar to New Jersey eustatic estimates. We conclude that sea-level rise and fall is a first-order control on accommodation providing similar timing on all margins to the sequence record. Tectonic changes due to movement of the crust can overprint the record, resulting in large gaps in the stratigraphic record. Smaller differences in sequences can be attributed to local flexural loading effects, particularly in regions experiencing large-scale progradation.

Key Words: Miocene • sequence stratigraphy • Delaware • New Jersey • eustasy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Hayden, M. Kominz, D. S. Powars, L. E. Edwards, K. G. Miller, J. V. Browning, and A. A. Kulpecz Impact effects and regional tectonic insights: Backstripping the Chesapeake Bay impact structure Geology, April 1, 2008; 36(4): 327 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Hannisdal Inferring phenotypic evolution in the fossil record by Bayesian inversion Paleobiology, January 1, 2007; 33(1): 98 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]