Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; May 2006; v. 118; no. 5-6; p. 589-605; DOI: 10.1130/B25772.1
© 2006 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, N. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Morphologies of knickpoints in submarine canyons

Neil C. Mitchell{dagger},1

1 School of Earth, Ocean and Planetary Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3YE, Wales

The question of how turbidity currents erode their beds is important for understanding how submarine canyons develop, how they maintain continuity in tectonically active margins to ensure sediment bypass, and for knowing how knickpoints (reaches of anomalously steep gradient) record tectonic information. The problem is potentially more complex than fluvial erosion, because flow vigor is also affected by the flow entraining ambient water and incorporating or depositing suspended load, which can significantly affect its excess density. However, in canyon sections where the total sedimentary mass passing through the canyon is much larger than the locally excavated mass, the solid loads of eroding currents change little during passage down-canyon. Canyon morphology can then potentially reveal how gradient and other factors affect erosion rate. Simple bed erosion models are presented herein, which are analogous to the detachment- and transport-limited erosion models of fluvial geomorphology, which predict that the channel topography should advect or diffuse (smooth out), respectively. Data sets from continental slopes off Alaska, New Jersey, Oregon, Chile, the Barbados accretionary prism, and published maps from other areas show these tendencies. Although knickpoints may arise from spatially varied resistance to erosion, some of those described here lie upstream of faults or anticlines and within uniform turbidites, implying that they can advect upstream. A forward numerical model is developed for knickpoints in the southern Barbados accretionary prism, which appear to have been created in a simple manner by the frontmost thrusts. If the erosion rules are applied continuously, the channel profiles are well represented with both advective and diffusive components. If a boundary condition of nondeposition/erosion is imposed on the base of the knickpoint slope (representing scour associated with a hydraulic jump, for example), the upstream profiles can be reproduced solely by diffusion. In these channels, the threshold stress for transport or erosion is probably small relative to stress imposed by the currents, because modeling shows that a threshold sharpens the knickpoint lip rather than rounds it. For the other, mostly smaller, knickpoints studied, however, the lip varies from sharp to rounded. This varied morphology could arise from a number of influences: effects of flow acceleration, differing threshold stress, differing sediment flux affecting flow power, or depth-varying substrate resistance to erosion. Despite the diversity of forms, upstream migrations imply that erosion can be enhanced where flow is more vigorous on steep gradients, implying that the body rather than the head of turbidity currents is responsible for erosion in those cases. Also discussed is how bed failure, quarrying, and abrasive scour lead to knickpoint evolution in submarine channels that is analogous to that in fluvial channels, but also likely differences are noted.

Key Words: accretionary prisms • tectonically active continental slopes • submarine canyon morphology • stream bed erosion




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
P. Heinio and R. J. Davies
Trails of depressions and sediment waves along submarine channels on the continental margin of Espirito Santo Basin, Brazil
Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2009; 121(5-6): 698 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeosphereHome page
C. K. Morley
Growth of folds in a deep-water setting
Geosphere, April 1, 2009; 5(2): 59 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
K. M. Straub and D. Mohrig
Constructional Canyons Built by Sheet-Like Turbidity Currents: Observations from Offshore Brunei Darussalam
Journal of Sedimentary Research, January 1, 2009; 79(1): 24 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
A. Noda, T. TuZino, R. Furukawa, M. Joshima, and J.-i. Uchida
Physiographical and sedimentological characteristics of submarine canyons developed upon an active forearc slope: The Kushiro Submarine Canyon, northern Japan
Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2008; 120(5-6): 750 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
H. Toniolo and A. Cantelli
Experiments on Upstream-Migrating Submarine Knickpoints
Journal of Sedimentary Research, September 1, 2007; 77(9): 772 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America