|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,1
,2
,3
1 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487 USA
2 Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
3 Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
We present a new geologic map of western Nepal and three balanced regional cross sections in the Himalayan thrust belt. The minimum shortening between the South Tibetan detachment and the Main Frontal thrust is 485–743 km and suggests that total Himalayan shortening may exceed 900 km. All rocks involved in the thrust belt are of upper crustal affinity, implying that a comparable length of Indian lower crust and mantle lithosphere was subducted beneath Tibet. Major structural features are the Subhimalayan thrust system, Lesser Himalayan imbricate zone, Dadeldhura thrust sheet, Lesser Himalayan duplex, Ramgarh thrust sheet, Main Central thrust sheet, and a north-dipping normal-sense shear zone, possibly related to the South Tibetan detachment. These structures are continuous along the entire Nepalese portion of the Himalayan thrust belt. New 40Ar/39Ar ages from the Ramgarh thrust zone, Greater Himalayan rocks, and the lower part of the Tethyan sequence support a kinematic model in which major thrust systems in Nepal propagated southward from early Miocene time onward. The geometry and kinematic history of the thrust belt in western Nepal are not compatible with recent models for southward ductile extrusion of Greater Himalayan rocks in a mid-crustal channel. Instead, the thrust belt in western Nepal behaved like a typical forward propagating thrust system, involving unmetamorphosed, brittlely deformed rocks in its frontal part and ductilely deformed, higher-grade metamorphic rocks in its hinterland region. Although our results do not support published versions of the channel flow model, they provide additional geological and geo-chronological data that will assist future attempts to develop geodynamic models for the Himalayan-Tibetan orogenic system.
Key Words: Himalaya • thrust belt • Nepal • regional mapping • geochronology
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. P. SEARLE, R. D. LAW, L. GODIN, K. P. LARSON, M. J. STREULE, J. M. COTTLE, and M. J. JESSUP Defining the Himalayan Main Central Thrust in Nepal Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2008; 165(2): 523 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Kohn P-T-t data from central Nepal support critical taper and repudiate large-scale channel flow of the Greater Himalayan Sequence GSA Bulletin, March 1, 2008; 120(3-4): 259 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Murphy Isotopic characteristics of the Gurla Mandhata metamorphic core complex: Implications for the architecture of the Himalayan orogen Geology, November 1, 2007; 35(11): 983 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. G. Webb, A. Yin, T. M. Harrison, J. Celerier, and W. P. Burgess The leading edge of the Greater Himalayan Crystalline complex revealed in the NW Indian Himalaya: Implications for the evolution of the Himalayan orogen Geology, October 1, 2007; 35(10): 955 - 958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Robinson and O. N. Pearson Exhumation of Greater Himalayan rock along the Main Central Thrust in Nepal: implications for channel flow Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 268(1): 255 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
