|
|
 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,1
1 Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599–3315, USA
2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112–0111, USA
Magmatic stoping is widely called upon to explain discordant pluton contacts, but several lines of evidence indicate that stoping is not volumetrically significant in the emplacement of most plutons. First, xenoliths rarely make up more than a few percent of most plutons; this sparseness, even on well-exposed pluton floors, argues that few xenoliths make it into plutons. Second, piles of rock fragments have sufficiently high porosities (
50%) that a significant accumulation of stoped blocks on the floor of a magma chamber would trap much, if not all, of the available magma, producing pluton-scale magmatic breccias that are not observed. Third, although settling calculations show that large (meter-scale or larger) xenoliths could sink rapidly in magma, natural fragmentation processes are likely to produce a fractal distribution of particle sizes, with small particles far more abundant than large ones. The absence of small xenoliths at pluton contacts, where magma cools most rapidly, thus argues against stoping. Fourth, although contamination of magmas by anatectic liquids derived from wall rocks and xenoliths is common, geochemical data from many plutons clearly rule out significant bulk assimilation of local wall rocks. Finally, there is growing evidence that at least some large plutons never were large molten bodies of magma but grew incrementally. Stoping cannot be volumetrically important in incrementally emplaced plutons, because blocks can only fall through the volume that is molten at any given time. Where xenoliths are abundant in plutons, they may commonly represent isolation of wall-rock bodies between successive intrusive increments rather than wall-rock fragments that were engulfed by magma. However, even xenoliths that were engulfed by magma did not necessarily sink from the roof of a magma chamber. Although stoping undoubtedly occurs during the emplacement of some plutons, it is unlikely to be a volumetrically significant process.
Key Words: igneous petrology • structural geology • tectonics • pluton • xenolith
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. G. Barnes, T. Prestvik, Y. Li, L. McCulloch, A. S. Yoshinobu, and C. D. Frost Growth and zoning of the Hortavaer intrusive complex, a layered alkaline pluton in the Norwegian Caledonides Geosphere, June 1, 2009; 5(3): 286 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. B. Clarke and S. Erdmann Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Comment Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 120(7-8): 1072 - 1074. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Paterson, G. S. Pignotta, D. Farris, V. Memeti, R. B. Miller, R. H. Vernon, and J. Zak Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Discussion Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 120(7-8): 1075 - 1079. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Yoshinobu and C. G. Barnes Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Discussion Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 120(7-8): 1080 - 1081. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Brown Crustal melting and melt extraction, ascent and emplacement in orogens: mechanisms and consequences Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 2007; 164(4): 709 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. F. Glazner Thermal limitations on incorporation of wall rock into magma Geology, April 1, 2007; 35(4): 319 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
