Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; November/December, 2007; v. 119; no. 11-12; p. 1387-1404; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2007)119[1387:TFILCR]2.0.CO;2
© 2007 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Eyal, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Throughgoing fractures in layered carbonate rocks

Michael R. Gross*,1 and Yehuda Eyal{dagger},2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, USA
2 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel

Fracture surveys were conducted across a broad anticline in southern Israel in order to investigate the development and geometries of throughgoing fractures in layered carbonate rocks. At Halukim anticline, throughgoing fractures form by the linkage and coalescence of preexisting, bed-confined joints. Thus the internal morphology of these structures is highly segmented, often consisting of vertically aligned zones of subparallel fractures and bed partings linked together across the stratigraphy. The large population (n = 132) of throughgoing fractures represents a continuum of structures at various stages of development that can be classified into three main geometric categories corresponding to increasing levels of brittle strain: incipient, linked, and linked with aperture. Despite the wide variety of internal morphologies and geometries, the throughgoing fractures display a consistent east-northeast–west-southwest orientation, parallel to a set of bed- confined cross joints. The spatial distribution of throughgoing fractures varies as a function of structural position, the highest frequency and estimated strain intensity being located at the fold crest. Results suggest that throughgoing fractures develop only after a critical level of strain is achieved, as quantified by the density of bed-confined joints. Throughgoing fractures are multilayer structures that may greatly enhance the connectivity of a fracture network; therefore, understanding their formation, geometry, and distribution may contribute to efforts of flow modeling in fractured carbonate rocks.

Key Words: fractures • fracture zones • brittle deformation • joints • connectivity • Israel




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
S. E. Laubach, J. E. Olson, and M. R. Gross
Mechanical and fracture stratigraphy
AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1413 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America