Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; September/October, 2007; v. 119; no. 9-10; p. 1079-1106; DOI: 10.1130/B25976.1
© 2007 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Twiss, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Unruh, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Structure, deformation, and strength of the Loma Prieta fault, northern California, USA, as inferred from the 1989–1990 Loma Prieta aftershock sequence

Robert J. Twiss{dagger},1 and Jeffrey R. Unruh{ddagger},2

1 Geology Department, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
2 William Lettis and Associates, 1777 Botelho Dr., Suite 262, Walnut Creek, California 94596, USA

Analysis of aftershock focal mechanisms of the October 1989, M 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake reveals details of structure and deformation. Aftershocks below 4–6 km define an alignment plane oriented (131°, 65°). This alignment includes three planar segments defining a restraining bend in a blind strike-slip fault. Dextral strike-slip dominates in the south, and reverse-dextral slip dominates in the north, a distribution similar to slip during the main shock. Above this fault, dominantly reverse faults striking roughly 110° lie en echelon along the main fault trend.

In the 17 sets of spatially clustered aftershocks, a more complex substructure is defined by local planar hypocenter alignments and by preferred orientations of aftershock shear planes. The maximum shortening axes make angles with the normal to these planes that average {theta} {approx} 46° and {theta} {approx} 53°, respectively. These angles are incompatible with a weak fault, for which 0° ≤ {theta} ≤ 20°. Orientations of preferred aftershock shear planes resemble Riedel shears relative to local hypocenter alignment planes. The similarity of slip distributions inferred from the aftershock inversions and from the main shock implies that the stress drop during the main shock was incomplete and, thus, that the Loma Prieta fault is not unusually weak.

Triaxial brittle deformation is partitioned into a pair of plane strains rotated relative to each other about a common principal axis. The shape of the triaxial strain ellipsoid determines the angle of rotation. Evidence supports our micropolar model of brittle deformation, which predicts that the antisymmetric part of the seismic moment tensor records effects of block rotations.

Key Words: Loma Prieta earthquake • aftershocks • inversion • strain • partitioning • strength • brittle deformation • fault zones • rotation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
R. J. Twiss
An Asymmetric Micropolar Moment Tensor Derived from a Discrete-Block Model for a Rotating Granular Substructure
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, May 1, 2009; 99(2B): 1103 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America