Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wittmann, A. Articles by Stöffler, D. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Reconstruction of the Chicxulub ejecta plume from its deposits in drill core Yaxcopoil-1

A. Wittmann^,1, T. Kenkmann^,1, L. Hecht^,1 and D. Stöffler^#,1

¹ Museum für Naturkunde, Mineralogie, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany

Formation conditions of suevite-like impactites from an 100 m thick drill core sequence through the Cretaceous-Tertiary Chicxulub crater were reconstructed from empirical data obtained by petrologic and image analytical methods. The temporal evolution of the cratering process from the initial stage of excavation to the collapse of the ejecta plume is evidenced by the petrographic characteristics and modal composition of the suevitic rocks, including the size distribution and shape parameters of melt particles. Emplacement of the lowermost suevitic deposits likely started in the first minute after the impact by the passing ejecta curtain that interacted with the expanding ejecta plume. These ejecta deposits were capped by a tongue of coherent impact melt that was transported outward from the crater center during the collapse of the central uplift 5 min after impact. On top of this brecciated impact melt rock, the collapsing ejecta plume deposited air-fall suevites. The basal air-fall unit, Middle Suevite, may have been deposited due to a density current–like clumping of hot debris. With progressive cooling, regions of the ejecta plume were entrained in its collapse that produced vapor condensates, accretionary rims, and different oxygen fugacities. After cooling progressed, atmospheric conditions began to reestablish over the crater and turbulence decreased, supposedly after the first 10 min of initial ejecta plume collapse. This led to a winnowing out of fine matrix material and distinct sorting. However, due to aquatic reworking, only material that was deposited until 1 h after cessation of turbulent atmospheric conditions was retained.

Key Words: Chicxulub crater • suevite • impac-tite • meteorite crater • Yaxcopoil-1 • ejecta • Cretaceous-Tertiary • Yucatan • impact

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. S. Gohn, C. Koeberl, K. G. Miller, W. U. Reimold, J. V. Browning, C. S. Cockell, J. W. Horton Jr., T. Kenkmann, A. A. Kulpecz, D. S. Powars, et al. Deep Drilling into the Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure Science, June 27, 2008; 320(5884): 1740 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]