Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; May 2008; v. 120; no. 5-6; p. 679-690; DOI: 10.1130/B26210.1
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chi, W.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, D. L.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Evolution of shallow, crustal thermal structure from subduction to collision: An example from Taiwan

Wu-Cheng Chi1,{dagger} and Donald L. Reed2,*

1 Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica 128 Sec 2 Academia Road, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
2 Department of Geology, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, California 95192-0102, USA

Correspondence: {dagger}E-mail:chi{at}earth.sinica.edu.tw

Correspondence: *E-mail:dreed{at}geosun.sjsu.edu

We study crustal thermal evolution by examining heat flow patterns along a convergent boundary from a young subduction zone to a more structurally mature collision zone. More than 8000 km of seismic profiles covering an offshore region of 45,000 km2 in southern Taiwan show widespread bottom-simulating reflectors (BSRs). We derived 1107 BSR-based heat flows before combining 42 additional, published, offshore thermal probe data and 86 on-land heat flow data to document the shallow forearc thermal structures from the subduction zone to the collision zone. In the subduction zone, the geothermal gradient ranges mostly within 30–80 °C/km, and decreases toward the arc due to slab cooling, intensive dewatering at the toe, sediment blanketing, topographic effects, and other processes. The geothermal gradient ranges mostly from 30 to 90 °C/km in the collision zone, and increases, instead of decreases, toward the arc, possibly caused by exhumation, erosion, topographically induced ground-water circulation, and some upper mantle processes related to collision. Heat flow in the collision zone ranges from 80 to 250 mW/m2. The high heat flow in the collision zone correlates with a shallower seismicity zone and high seismic attenuation, while the lower heat flow in the subduction zone might allow the earthquakes to rupture to greater depth. The heat flow increases along the topographic high from subduction to collision zone due to increasing geothermal gradients and higher thermal conductivities of the exhumed basement rocks. This heat flow variation may generate an artificial exhumation rate pattern, if a conventional 30 °C/km geothermal gradient was used in fission-track studies.

Key Words: bottom-simulating reflector • hydrates • geothermal gradient • heat flow • Taiwan • subduction • collision • seismogenic zone • fission-track dating







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America