Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; November 1967; v. 78; no. 11; p. 1385-1422; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1967)78[1385:SAPOFU]2.0.CO;2
© 1967 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHMINCKE, H.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Stratigraphy and Petrography of Four Upper Yakima Basalt Flows in South-Central Washington

HANS-ULRICH SCHMINCKE

Mineralogisch-Petrographisches Institut, Laboratorium für Sediment-forschung, Berlinerstrasse 19, 69 Heidelberg, West Germany

Field and laboratory investigations of the Yakima Basalt in south-central Washington show that the upper flows consist of four widespread sheets and interbedded sediments. From oldest to youngest, they are: Umatilla Basalt, Selah Member of the Ellensburg Formation, Pomona Basalt, Rattlesnake Ridge Member of the Ellensburg Formation, Elephant Mountain Basalt, and Ward Gap Basalt. Compared with two other local occurrences, the Pomona Basalt is identical with the Selah Butte flow and correlated with it, but is only similar to and probably older than the Huntzinger flow.

The basalts are tholeiites and, except for Pomona Basalt, aphyric. During flowage, they were more than 95 percent liquid and crystallization began with olivine, followed by magnetite, plagioclase, and clinopyroxene. Intraflow variations in textures, modes, and mineral composition are determined by the crystallinity, which depends on the cooling history and varies widely within a flow. In general, the flows are glassiest in their interiors, whereas the lower and upper colonnades are hypocrystalline. Glass contents, for example, vary more than 60–70 modal percent within the Elephant Mountain and Umatilla flows. Vertical or lateral variations unrelated to crystallinity were not found.

Characteristic structural and petrographic interflow differences, which are present despite internal variations, depend mainly on primary differences in chemical composition. Pomona Basalt is distinguished from the other flows by its magnesium- and calcium-rich composition. Umatilla Basalt differs from the Elephant Mountain flow in having lower total iron, magnesium, and calcium but higher alkalies. Ward Gap Basalt resembles the crystalline Elephant Mountain Basalt.

The approximate average thicknesses (in meters), minimum extents (in square kilometers), and volumes (in cubic kilometers) of the four flows are: Umatilla Basalt—45 m, 5180 km2, 233 km3; Pamona Basalt—30 m, 18,000 km2, 540 km3; Elephant Mountain Basalt—10 m, 10,350 km2, 103 km3; and Ward Gap Basalt—10 m, 5120 km2, 51 km3.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America