Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

GSA Bulletin; January 2008; v. 120; no. 1-2; p. 96-105; DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(2008)120[96:RSAGFD]2.0.CO;2
© 2008 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khan, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Remote sensing and geochemistry for detecting hydrocarbon microseepages

Shuhab D. Khan*,1 and Sarah Jacobson1

1 Department of Geosciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204-5007, USA


Figure 01
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. (A) Processes by which microseeping hydrocarbons migrate from the reservoir to the surface through faults, fractures as well as stratigraphic boundaries (modified from Schumacher, 1999). (B) Generalized model of hydrocarbon-induced geochemical alterations of soils and sediments (modified from Schumacher, 1996).

 

Figure 02
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Landsat thematic mapper showing major structural features of south-central Wyoming. The Patrick Draw study area is on the east flank of the Rock Springs uplift (boundaries modified from Skeeters and Hale, 1972).

 

Figure 03
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. (A) Field map of areas of interest and locations of all samples collected in the field with their labeled names. (B) Photo taken within a lineament at Patrick Draw during field work in the summer of 2005 showing anomalous zone.

 

Figure 04
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Classification results for Patrick Draw area. (A) Spectral reflectance of the end members used in Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) classification; color of spectra corresponds to color of the class. Field and image spectra are added for comparison. (B) SAM classification based on laboratory spectroscopy.

 

Figure 05
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Patrick Draw area, showing previously determined points of microseeping, associated lineaments, anomalous area (in black), and outline of transitional member of Fort Union Formation.

 

Figure 06
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Bar graph showing average mineralogical composition based on laboratory spectroscopy.

 

Figure 07
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Model for hydrocarbon microseepage in Patrick Draw. Stratigraphy based on Weimer (1966).

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Geological Society of America