Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
GSA Bulletin Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published on April 24, 2009, doi:10.1130/B26446.1

GSA Bulletin 2009;121:1135.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009
© 2009 Geological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
B26446.1v1
121/7-8/1135    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheney, E. S
Right arrow Articles by Hayman, N.W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The Chiwaukum Structural Low: Cenozoic shortening of the central Cascade Range, Washington State, USA

Eric S Cheney1 and N.W Hayman2

1 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1310, USA
2 University of Texas, Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, J.J. Pickle Research Campus, 10100 Burnet Road, (R2200), Austin, Texas 78758, USA

The central Cascade Range of Washington State has become a testing ground for theories surrounding the exhumation of deep-seated arcs, generation of both arc and flood-basalt volcanism, strike-slip faulting that translated crustal blocks along the Cordilleran margin, and development of fault-bounded basins. A central existing hypothesis is that the region underwent either regional extension or transtension during the Eocene. Both the extension and transtension models derive from the interpretation that clastic Eocene formations were deposited syntectonically in local basins. Geologic mapping and structural analyses presented here support an alternative hypothesis: that these formations are preserved in regional synclines, not in separate depositional basins. The type area for the Eocene history is the so-called Chiwaukum graben or Chumstick basin, here renamed the Chiwaukum Structural Low. The southwestern boundary of the Chiwaukum Structural Low includes post-depositional, northwest-striking reverse faults with adjacent northwest striking folds. The reverse faults place the regionally extensive and arkosic, early Eocene Swauk Formation over arkosic, mid-Eocene strata that have previously been called the Chumstick Formation. Cataclastic structures provide independent evidence for the reverse faulting. Elsewhere, 39–42 Ma rocks unconformably overlie the folds. The reverse faults and fold hinges are cut by northerly striking strike-slip faults, which likely are of late Eocene age. The Eocene folds and faults were reactivated by deformation of the Miocene Columbia River Basalt Group, the gentler folding of which largely defines the regional map pattern around the Chiwaukum Structural Low. Instead of an extensional or transtensional history, the Eocene-to-Recent history of the Central Cascade region is characterized by multiple periods of folding and reverse faulting alternating with periods of strike-slip faulting.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of America