In their comment, Landing and Kruse disagree with some of our discussion and, at times, use blanket statements to incorrectly summarize from the Smith et al. (2016) paper. This is not the venue for a discussion and rehashing of the details discussed at length in the text of the publication. Here, we respond only to what we were able to identify as the key questions and issues raised in the comment.
- Received 3 February 2017.
- Revision received 18 March 2017.
- Accepted 4 April 2017.
- ©The Authors
Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license.